These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8281731)

  • 1. Low literacy: a problem in diabetes education.
    Overland JE; Hoskins PL; McGill MJ; Yue DK
    Diabet Med; 1993 Nov; 10(9):847-50. PubMed ID: 8281731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An exploratory study of older adults' comprehension of printed cancer information: is readability a key factor?
    Friedman DB; Hoffman-Goetz L
    J Health Commun; 2007; 12(5):423-37. PubMed ID: 17710594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discrepancy between older clients' ability to read and comprehend and the reading level of written educational materials used by occupational therapists.
    Griffin J; McKenna K; Tooth L
    Am J Occup Ther; 2006; 60(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 16541986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Readability of Written Materials for CKD Patients: A Systematic Review.
    Morony S; Flynn M; McCaffery KJ; Jansen J; Webster AC
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2015 Jun; 65(6):842-50. PubMed ID: 25661679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient-appropriate health literacy educational materials in ophthalmology.
    Mikhail D; Visscher KL; Chen N; Wang J; Emara BY; Hutnik CM
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2015 Feb; 50(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 25677278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Readability of patient education materials in ophthalmology: a single-institution study and systematic review.
    Williams AM; Muir KW; Rosdahl JA
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 16():133. PubMed ID: 27487960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information.
    Cheng C; Dunn M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 39(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 25716142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The numeracy demands of health education information: an examination of numerical concepts in written diabetes materials.
    Joram E; Roberts-Dobie S; Mattison SJ; Devlin M; Herbrandson K; Hansen K; Eslinger D
    Health Commun; 2012; 27(4):344-55. PubMed ID: 21916698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A readability assessment of online stroke information.
    Sharma N; Tridimas A; Fitzsimmons PR
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014 Jul; 23(6):1362-7. PubMed ID: 24389374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Readability of Shoulder and Elbow Patient Education Materials within Orthopaedic Websites.
    Beutel BG; Danna NR; Melamed E; Capo JT
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 26630468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anticoagulant patient information material is written at high readability levels.
    Estrada CA; Hryniewicz MM; Higgs VB; Collins C; Byrd JC
    Stroke; 2000 Dec; 31(12):2966-70. PubMed ID: 11108757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing readability formula differences with written health information materials: application, results, and recommendations.
    Wang LW; Miller MJ; Schmitt MR; Wen FK
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2013; 9(5):503-16. PubMed ID: 22835706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of stroke patients' and carers' reading ability and the content and design of written materials: recommendations for improving written stroke information.
    Hoffmann T; McKenna K
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Mar; 60(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 16098708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing Readability: Are Urogynecologic Patient Education Materials at an Appropriate Reading Level?
    Haller J; Keller Z; Barr S; Hadden K; Oliphant SS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):139-144. PubMed ID: 30807416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emergency department patient literacy and the readability of patient-directed materials.
    Powers RD
    Ann Emerg Med; 1988 Feb; 17(2):124-6. PubMed ID: 3337429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health Literacy: Readability of ACC/AHA Online Patient Education Material.
    Kapoor K; George P; Evans MC; Miller WJ; Liu SS
    Cardiology; 2017; 138(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 28571004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the Readability of Dermatological Postoperative Patient Information Leaflets Across England.
    Hunt WT; McGrath EJ
    Dermatol Surg; 2016 Jun; 42(6):757-63. PubMed ID: 27176870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The association of patients' oral health literacy and dental school communication tools: a pilot study.
    Tam A; Yue O; Atchison KA; Richards JK; Holtzman JS
    J Dent Educ; 2015 May; 79(5):530-8. PubMed ID: 25941146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of SMOG-Cro readability formula for healthcare communication and patient education.
    Brangan S
    Coll Antropol; 2015 Mar; 39(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 26040062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to facial fractures.
    Sanghvi S; Cherla DV; Shukla PA; Eloy JA
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Sep; 122(9):1943-8. PubMed ID: 22833340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.