These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8282503)

  • 21. Contrast agents for cardiac catheterization: conceptions and misconceptions.
    Brogan WC; Hillis LD; Lange RA
    Am Heart J; 1991 Oct; 122(4 Pt 1):1129-35. PubMed ID: 1927863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Profound platelet degranulation is an important side effect of some types of contrast media used in interventional cardiology.
    Chronos NA; Goodall AH; Wilson DJ; Sigwart U; Buller NP
    Circulation; 1993 Nov; 88(5 Pt 1):2035-44. PubMed ID: 8222096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relationship of anticoagulation and radiographic contrast agents to thrombosis during coronary angiography and angioplasty: are there real concerns?
    Hill JA; Grabowski EF
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1992 Mar; 25(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 1571975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Thrombogenic potential of non-ionic contrast media--fact or fiction?
    Schräder R
    Eur J Radiol; 1996 Nov; 23 Suppl 1():S10-3. PubMed ID: 9056158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Electrolyte addition to nonionic contrast media. Cardiac effects during experimental coronary arteriography.
    Pedersen HK
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 405():1-31. PubMed ID: 8792751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of ionic and low-osmolar contrast media during cardiac catheterization.
    Davidson CJ; Bashore TM
    Trends Cardiovasc Med; 1991 Mar; 1(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 21239336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The physiologic effects of nonionic contrast media on the heart.
    Morris TW
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S44-6; discussion S47. PubMed ID: 8282502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Adverse reactions of low osmolar non-ionic and ionic contrast media when used together or separately during percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Juergens CP; Khaing AM; McIntyre GJ; Leung DY; Lo ST; Fernandes C; Hopkins AP
    Heart Lung Circ; 2005 Sep; 14(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 16352273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adverse events with radiographic contrast agents: results of the SCVIR Contrast Agent Registry.
    Bettmann MA; Heeren T; Greenfield A; Goudey C
    Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):611-20. PubMed ID: 9169677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Long-term results using a nonionic contrast medium--a report of clinical experiences].
    Hruby W; Stellamor K
    Rontgenblatter; 1987 Mar; 40(3):73-7. PubMed ID: 3576085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Safety of nonionic agents in visceral angiography.
    Enge IP
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S39-42; discussion S43. PubMed ID: 8282501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Early hemodynamic cardiovascular reactions to nonionic low-osmolar contrast media in coronary angiography].
    Wink K
    Rontgenblatter; 1988 Sep; 41(9):384-8. PubMed ID: 3175478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Comparison of the tolerance of ionic and nonionic contrast media in coronary angiography].
    Savchenko AP; Frolova MI; Pavlov NA
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1993; (6):21-4. PubMed ID: 7801591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nonionic low-osmolar contrast media have no impact on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary stenting with appropriate antiplatelet therapy.
    Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Predolini S; Baglini R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Dec; 60(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14624424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of heparinized low osmolality ionic and nonionic contrast media in 500 patients undergoing cardiac angiography.
    Feldman RL
    Clin Cardiol; 1990 Nov; 13(11):794-6. PubMed ID: 2272136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiography.
    Gertz EW; Wisneski JA; Chiu D; Akin JR; Hu C
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Feb; 5(2 Pt 1):250-8. PubMed ID: 3881496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of low osmolality ionic (ioxaglate) versus nonionic (iopamidol) contrast media in cardiac angiography.
    Wisneski JA; Gertz EW; Dahlgren M; Muslin A
    Am J Cardiol; 1989 Feb; 63(7):489-95. PubMed ID: 2916435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Percutaneous coronary angioscopic comparison of thrombus formation during percutaneous coronary angioplasty with ionic and nonionic low osmolality contrast media in unstable angina.
    Qureshi NR; den Heijer P; Crijns HJ
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 80(6):700-4. PubMed ID: 9315572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Acute occlusion of coronary artery bypass graft with nonionic contrast medium.
    Tomizawa Y; Endo M; Nishida H; Koyanagi H
    Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Apr; 50(4):181-3. PubMed ID: 11993202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Complications of cardiac angiography using low- or high-osmolality contrast agents in patients with left main coronary stenosis.
    Kussmaul WG; Mishra JP; Matthai WH; Hirshfeld JW
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1997 Dec; 42(4):376-9. PubMed ID: 9408613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.