These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8282506)

  • 21. Spiral CT with ionic and nonionic contrast material: evaluation of patient motion and scan quality.
    Stockberger SM; Hicklin JA; Liang Y; Wass JL; Ambrosius WT
    Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):631-6. PubMed ID: 9494478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contrast enhancement of the liver and blood. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in the pig.
    Jensen LI; Golman K; Nyman U; Dean PB
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Dec; 20(9):989-94. PubMed ID: 4077451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The use of nonionic contrast agents in neuroangiography. A review of the literature and recommendations for clinical use.
    Latchaw RE
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S55-9; discussion S60-1. PubMed ID: 8282504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Contrast media in cardiology. Report of a randomized, double-blind multicenter comparative study of the side effects of ionic and non-ionic roentgen contrast media].
    Hellige G; Vogel B; Tebbe U; Kreuzer H
    Z Kardiol; 1992 May; 81(5):290-2. PubMed ID: 1621410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Neurotoxic complications of contrast computed tomography in children.
    Haslam RH; Cochrane DD; Amundson GM; Johns RD
    J Pediatr; 1987 Dec; 111(6 Pt 1):837-40. PubMed ID: 3681547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Blood clot formation in angiographic syringes containing nonionic contrast media.
    Robertson HJ
    Radiology; 1987 Mar; 162(3):621-2. PubMed ID: 3809474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Iobitridol 300 compared to iopromide 300--a double-blind randomized phase-III study of clinical tolerance in total body CT.
    Hoogewoud HM; Woessmer B
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():62-4. PubMed ID: 8619354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Intolerance reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media in cardiac diagnosis. A randomized double-blind study].
    Machraoui A; Hinrichsen M; Jäger D; Lemke B; Drews S; Lange S; Barmeyer J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1991 Mar; 116(9):321-6. PubMed ID: 1997305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of iohexol and diatrizoate-meglumine in children undergoing cardiac catheterization.
    Pelech AN; Allard SM; Hurd RT; Giddins NG; Collins GF
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jul; 26(7):665-70. PubMed ID: 1885274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): advantages over standard ionic agents.
    Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Bhargava V; Stein JB; Lew W; Slutsky RA; Shabetai R; Higgins CB
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Apr; 51(7):1218-22. PubMed ID: 6837464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of the hemodynamic effects of intravenous administration of ionic and nonionic contrast materials. Implications for deriving physiologic measurements from computed tomography and digital cardiovascular imaging.
    Higgins CB; Gerber KH; Mattrey RF; Slutsky RA
    Radiology; 1982 Mar; 142(3):681-6. PubMed ID: 7063684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rates of idiosyncratic reactions. Ionic versus nonionic contrast media.
    Siegle RL
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S95-8; discussion S99. PubMed ID: 8282511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Safety of nonionic agents in visceral angiography.
    Enge IP
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S39-42; discussion S43. PubMed ID: 8282501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of iopromide with iopamidol and iohexol for contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
    Goldberg SN; Abrahams J; Drayer BP; Golding S; Bernardino M; Brunetti J
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S76-83; discussion S93. PubMed ID: 8071050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Renal and hepatic tolerance of nonionic and ionic contrast media in intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Langer M; Junge W; Keysser R; Hasford J; Jänicke UA
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():95-100. PubMed ID: 2568817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analysis of renal and hepatic impairment by ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Langer M; Langer R; Felix R; Speck U; Behrends B; Mützel W
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Sep; 25 Suppl 1():S125-6. PubMed ID: 2283230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neurotoxicity of iohexol: a new nonionic contrast medium.
    Bryan RN; Centeno RS; Hershkowitz N; Poelstra RJ; Osato MS
    Radiology; 1982 Nov; 145(2):379-82. PubMed ID: 7134441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical tolerance and diagnostic efficacy of iobitridol in contrast-enhanced CT in children.
    Smets A; Shaw D
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():65-7. PubMed ID: 8619355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimal contrast agents for vascular imaging on computed tomography: iodixanol versus iohexol.
    Pannu HK; Thompson RE; Phelps J; Magee CA; Fishman EK
    Acad Radiol; 2005 May; 12(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 15866130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Knee arthrography: effects of various contrast media and epinephrine on synovial fluid.
    Corbetti F; Malatesta V; Camposampiero A; Mazzi A; Punzi L; Angelini F; Vigo M; Todesco S
    Radiology; 1986 Oct; 161(1):195-8. PubMed ID: 3763866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.