330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8282508)
1. Contrast bolus dynamic computed tomography for the measurement of solid organ perfusion.
Blomley MJ; Coulden R; Bufkin C; Lipton MJ; Dawson P
Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S72-7; discussion S78. PubMed ID: 8282508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional imaging in computed tomography. The use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the study of renal function and physiology.
Dawson P; Peters AM
Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S79-84; discussion S85-6. PubMed ID: 8282509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effective use of low-osmolality contrast media for CT of the liver: evaluation of liver enhancement provided by various doses of iohexol.
Bree RL; Parisky YR; Bernardino ME; Costello P; Leder R; Brown PC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 8079849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimal contrast agents for vascular imaging on computed tomography: iodixanol versus iohexol.
Pannu HK; Thompson RE; Phelps J; Magee CA; Fishman EK
Acad Radiol; 2005 May; 12(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 15866130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of pharmacokinetics to computed tomography: injection rates and schemes: mono-, bi-, or multiphasic?
Krause W
Invest Radiol; 1996 Feb; 31(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 8750444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast enhancement of the liver and blood. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in the pig.
Jensen LI; Golman K; Nyman U; Dean PB
Invest Radiol; 1985 Dec; 20(9):989-94. PubMed ID: 4077451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the systemic responses to rapid intravenous injections of ioxilan, iohexol, and diatrizoate in rabbits.
Morris TW; Prentice L; Ventura J
Invest Radiol; 1989 Apr; 24(4):294-7. PubMed ID: 2745009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Administration and dosage of iohexol, a nonionic contrast medium, for dynamic renal computed tomography.
Tsugaya M; Sakagami H; Mogami T; Ohtaguro K; Hirao N; Kato F; Kato J; Hori T; Iwase Y
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1993 Aug; 39(8):687-93. PubMed ID: 8379468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of liver perfusion parameters studied with conventional extravascular and experimental intravascular CT contrast agents.
Kapanen M; Halavaara J; Häkkinen AM
Acad Radiol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):951-8. PubMed ID: 17659241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Renal CT after intravenous injection of nonionic dimeric or nonionic monomeric contrast media in healthy volunteers.
Rasmussen F; Lindequist S; Nielsen SM; Bjartveit K
Acta Radiol; 1997 Jan; 38(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 9059403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic computed tomography time--density study of normal human tissue after intravenous contrast administration.
Young SW; Noon MA; Marincek B
Invest Radiol; 1981; 16(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 7216694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-enhanced CT of the liver and spleen: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
Nelson RC; Chezmar JL; Peterson JE; Bernardino ME
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Nov; 153(5):973-6. PubMed ID: 2801447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time-density evaluation of the liver after iosulamide meglumine: a tissue-specific CT contrast agent.
Marincek B; Young SW; Enzmann DR
Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 7076441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hepatic dynamic sequential CT: section enhancement profiles with a bolus of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
Nelson RC; Moyers JH; Chezmar JL; Hoel MJ; Jones EC; Peterson JE; Cork RD; Bernardino ME
Radiology; 1991 Feb; 178(2):499-502. PubMed ID: 1987614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of contrast concentration on abdominal enhancement in the rabbit: spiral computed tomography evaluation.
Bluemke DA; Fishman EK; Anderson JH
Acad Radiol; 1995 Mar; 2(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 9419553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of pharmacokinetics to electron-beam tomography of the abdomen.
Krause W; Gröll R; Kern R; Baumgartner C; Rienmüller R
Acad Radiol; 1999 Aug; 6(8):487-95. PubMed ID: 10480045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of intravenous administration of a new nonionic dimeric contrast medium on the coronary circulation. Comparison with monomeric ionic and nonionic media.
Lanzer P; Dean PB; Lipton MJ; Sievers R; Botvinick E; Higgins CB
Invest Radiol; 1985 Oct; 20(7):746-50. PubMed ID: 4066245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT.
Tublin ME; Tessler FN; Cheng SL; Peters TL; McGovern PC
Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 9885593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simulation of aortic peak enhancement on MDCT using a contrast material flow phantom: feasibility study.
Awai K; Hatcho A; Nakayama Y; Kusunoki S; Liu D; Hatemura M; Funama Y; Denbo M; Sato N; Yamashita Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Feb; 186(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 16423942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]