BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8282508)

  • 1. Contrast bolus dynamic computed tomography for the measurement of solid organ perfusion.
    Blomley MJ; Coulden R; Bufkin C; Lipton MJ; Dawson P
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S72-7; discussion S78. PubMed ID: 8282508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functional imaging in computed tomography. The use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the study of renal function and physiology.
    Dawson P; Peters AM
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S79-84; discussion S85-6. PubMed ID: 8282509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effective use of low-osmolality contrast media for CT of the liver: evaluation of liver enhancement provided by various doses of iohexol.
    Bree RL; Parisky YR; Bernardino ME; Costello P; Leder R; Brown PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 8079849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal contrast agents for vascular imaging on computed tomography: iodixanol versus iohexol.
    Pannu HK; Thompson RE; Phelps J; Magee CA; Fishman EK
    Acad Radiol; 2005 May; 12(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 15866130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of pharmacokinetics to computed tomography: injection rates and schemes: mono-, bi-, or multiphasic?
    Krause W
    Invest Radiol; 1996 Feb; 31(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 8750444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrast enhancement of the liver and blood. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in the pig.
    Jensen LI; Golman K; Nyman U; Dean PB
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Dec; 20(9):989-94. PubMed ID: 4077451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
    Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the systemic responses to rapid intravenous injections of ioxilan, iohexol, and diatrizoate in rabbits.
    Morris TW; Prentice L; Ventura J
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Apr; 24(4):294-7. PubMed ID: 2745009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Administration and dosage of iohexol, a nonionic contrast medium, for dynamic renal computed tomography.
    Tsugaya M; Sakagami H; Mogami T; Ohtaguro K; Hirao N; Kato F; Kato J; Hori T; Iwase Y
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1993 Aug; 39(8):687-93. PubMed ID: 8379468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of liver perfusion parameters studied with conventional extravascular and experimental intravascular CT contrast agents.
    Kapanen M; Halavaara J; Häkkinen AM
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):951-8. PubMed ID: 17659241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Renal CT after intravenous injection of nonionic dimeric or nonionic monomeric contrast media in healthy volunteers.
    Rasmussen F; Lindequist S; Nielsen SM; Bjartveit K
    Acta Radiol; 1997 Jan; 38(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 9059403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic computed tomography time--density study of normal human tissue after intravenous contrast administration.
    Young SW; Noon MA; Marincek B
    Invest Radiol; 1981; 16(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 7216694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrast-enhanced CT of the liver and spleen: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
    Nelson RC; Chezmar JL; Peterson JE; Bernardino ME
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Nov; 153(5):973-6. PubMed ID: 2801447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time-density evaluation of the liver after iosulamide meglumine: a tissue-specific CT contrast agent.
    Marincek B; Young SW; Enzmann DR
    Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 7076441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hepatic dynamic sequential CT: section enhancement profiles with a bolus of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
    Nelson RC; Moyers JH; Chezmar JL; Hoel MJ; Jones EC; Peterson JE; Cork RD; Bernardino ME
    Radiology; 1991 Feb; 178(2):499-502. PubMed ID: 1987614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of contrast concentration on abdominal enhancement in the rabbit: spiral computed tomography evaluation.
    Bluemke DA; Fishman EK; Anderson JH
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Mar; 2(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 9419553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of pharmacokinetics to electron-beam tomography of the abdomen.
    Krause W; Gröll R; Kern R; Baumgartner C; Rienmüller R
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Aug; 6(8):487-95. PubMed ID: 10480045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of intravenous administration of a new nonionic dimeric contrast medium on the coronary circulation. Comparison with monomeric ionic and nonionic media.
    Lanzer P; Dean PB; Lipton MJ; Sievers R; Botvinick E; Higgins CB
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Oct; 20(7):746-50. PubMed ID: 4066245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT.
    Tublin ME; Tessler FN; Cheng SL; Peters TL; McGovern PC
    Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 9885593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulation of aortic peak enhancement on MDCT using a contrast material flow phantom: feasibility study.
    Awai K; Hatcho A; Nakayama Y; Kusunoki S; Liu D; Hatemura M; Funama Y; Denbo M; Sato N; Yamashita Y
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Feb; 186(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 16423942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.