These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8282511)

  • 1. Rates of idiosyncratic reactions. Ionic versus nonionic contrast media.
    Siegle RL
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S95-8; discussion S99. PubMed ID: 8282511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A review of the toxicity of nonionic contrast agents in children.
    Cohen MD
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S87-93; discussion S94. PubMed ID: 8282510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of nonionic contrast agents in neuroangiography. A review of the literature and recommendations for clinical use.
    Latchaw RE
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S55-9; discussion S60-1. PubMed ID: 8282504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The clotting issue: etiologic factors in thromboembolism. I. Chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicity of angiographic contrast agents.
    Dawson P
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S25-30. PubMed ID: 8282499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Iodinated radiographic contrast media: comparison of low-osmolar with conventional ionic agents [corrected].
    Rubin JD; Cohan RH
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Oct; 3(5):637-45. PubMed ID: 1931499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media.
    Cochran ST; Bomyea K; Sayre JW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jun; 176(6):1385-8. PubMed ID: 11373197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is the safety of contrast agents an issue in body computed tomography?
    Bernardino ME
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S68-70; discussion S71. PubMed ID: 8282506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety of nonionic agents in visceral angiography.
    Enge IP
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S39-42; discussion S43. PubMed ID: 8282501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonionic contrast media. Procoagulants or clotting innocents?
    Grabowski EF; Head C; Michelson AD
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S21-4. PubMed ID: 8282498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonionic contrast use in cardiac angiography.
    Hill JA
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S48-53; discussion S54. PubMed ID: 8282503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The clotting issue: etiologic factors in thromboembolism. II. Clinical considerations.
    Dawson P; Cousins C; Bradshaw A
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S31-6; discussion S37-8. PubMed ID: 8282500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast media safety: what do we know and how do we know it?
    Mishkin MM
    Am J Cardiol; 1990 Oct; 66(14):34F-36F. PubMed ID: 2239698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media.
    Katayama H; Yamaguchi K; Kozuka T; Takashima T; Seez P; Matsuura K
    Radiology; 1990 Jun; 175(3):621-8. PubMed ID: 2343107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective trial of ionic vs nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical practice: comparison of adverse effects.
    Wolf GL; Arenson RL; Cross AP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May; 152(5):939-44. PubMed ID: 2495706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic, high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization.
    Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS; Vavasour HM; O'Dea F; Kent G; Stone E
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb; 326(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 1732770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Long-term results using a nonionic contrast medium--a report of clinical experiences].
    Hruby W; Stellamor K
    Rontgenblatter; 1987 Mar; 40(3):73-7. PubMed ID: 3576085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency, outcome, and appropriateness of treatment of nonionic iodinated contrast media reactions.
    Wang CL; Cohan RH; Ellis JH; Caoili EM; Wang G; Francis IR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):409-15. PubMed ID: 18647910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Epidemiologic critique of the report on adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic media by the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media.
    Gerstman BB
    Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):787-90. PubMed ID: 1994419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the rates of adverse drug reactions. Ionic contrast agents, ionic agents combined with steroids, and nonionic agents.
    Wolf GL; Mishkin MM; Roux SG; Halpern EF; Gottlieb J; Zimmerman J; Gillen J; Thellman C
    Invest Radiol; 1991 May; 26(5):404-10. PubMed ID: 2055736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Contrast media in venous digital angiography: ionic or non-ionic?].
    Stacul F; Magnaldi S; Pozzi-Mucelli R; Muner G; Dalla Palma L
    Radiol Med; 1986 Nov; 72(11):815-22. PubMed ID: 3786845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.