These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8283859)

  • 41. Juror Decision Making in Acquaintance and Marital Rape: The Influence of Clothing, Alcohol, and Preexisting Stereotypical Attitudes.
    Osborn K; Davis JP; Button S; Foster J
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 Mar; 36(5-6):NP2675-NP2696. PubMed ID: 29629635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Measurement of empathy toward rape victims and rapists.
    Deitz SR; Blackwell KT; Daley PC; Bentley BJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1982 Aug; 43(2):372-84. PubMed ID: 7120042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cultural beliefs about rape and victims' response in three ethnic groups.
    Lefley HP; Scott CS; Llabre M; Hicks D
    Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1993 Oct; 63(4):623-32. PubMed ID: 8267103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cognitive predictors of not-guilty verdicts in a simulated acquaintance rape trial.
    Fischer GJ
    Psychol Rep; 1991 Jun; 68(3 Pt 2):1199-206. PubMed ID: 1924619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Is all prejudice created equal? The role of modern and aversive racism in mock juror decisions.
    Estrada-Reynolds V; Freng S; Schweitzer K; Leki EL
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2023; 30(5):579-599. PubMed ID: 37744645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Discrimination and instructional comprehension: guided discretion, racial bias, and the death penalty.
    Lynch M; Haney C
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Jun; 24(3):337-58. PubMed ID: 10846376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effects of general pretrial publicity on juror decisions: an examination of moderators and mediating mechanisms.
    Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):43-72. PubMed ID: 11868620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Factors affecting reactions to a rape victim.
    Barnett MA; Quackenbush SW; Sinisi CS; Wegman CM; Otney KL
    J Psychol; 1992 Nov; 126(6):609-20. PubMed ID: 1289504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases.
    Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Mock Juror Perceptions of Rape Victims: Impact of Case Characteristics and Individual Differences.
    Sommer S; Reynolds JJ; Kehn A
    J Interpers Violence; 2016 Oct; 31(17):2847-66. PubMed ID: 25900913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The influence of mitigation evidence, ethnicity, and SES on death penalty decisions by European American and Latino venire persons.
    Espinoza RK; Willis-Esqueda C
    Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol; 2015 Apr; 21(2):288-99. PubMed ID: 25150818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects of drinking by the victim or offender on verdicts in a simulated trial of an acquaintance rape.
    Fischer GJ
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Oct; 77(2):579-86. PubMed ID: 8559885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Attributions of victim blame in stranger and acquaintance rape: A quantitative study.
    Persson S; Dhingra K; Grogan S
    J Clin Nurs; 2018 Jul; 27(13-14):2640-2649. PubMed ID: 29518275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The Failure of All Mothers or the Mother of All Failures? Juror Perceptions of Failure to Protect Laws.
    Stanziani M; Cox J
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 Jan; 36(1-2):NP690-NP711. PubMed ID: 29294952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Victim Impact Statements: How Victim Social Class Affects Juror Decision Making.
    Schweitzer K; Nuñez N
    Violence Vict; 2017 Jun; 32(3):521-532. PubMed ID: 28516855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. What Counts as Rape? The Effect of Offense Prototypes, Victim Stereotypes, and Participant Gender on How the Complainant and Defendant are Perceived.
    McKimmie BM; Masser BM; Bongiorno R
    J Interpers Violence; 2014 Aug; 29(12):2273-2303. PubMed ID: 24470567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. "Race salience" in juror decision-making: misconceptions, clarifications, and unanswered questions.
    Sommers SR; Ellsworth PC
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(4):599-609. PubMed ID: 19513991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The relationship between verdict, defendant characteristics, and type of crime in sex-related criminal cases.
    Beck JC; Borenstein N; Dreyfus J
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1986; 14(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 3730627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. From whose perspective? Differences between actors and observers in determining the voluntariness of guilty pleas.
    Fessinger MB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Oct; 46(5):353-371. PubMed ID: 36227320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The influence of the victim's consumption of alcohol on perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape.
    Scronce CA; Corcoran KJ
    Violence Against Women; 1995 Sep; 1(3):241-53. PubMed ID: 12322334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.