These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8284371)

  • 21. Should plain films of the lumbar spine be taken in the posterior-to-anterior or anterior-to-posterior position? A study using decision analysis.
    Young KJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007; 30(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 17416274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The comparative measurement of the bone marrow dose in quantitative computed tomography (QCT), dual-photon radiography (DPX) and conventional x-rays of the LS].
    Kasperczyk A; Freyschmidt J; Well JC; Seeger W
    Rofo; 1991 Aug; 155(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 1878543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Regional survey of entrance surface dose to patients from X-ray examinations in Saudi Arabia.
    Saeed MK
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Jun; 38(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 25801149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Scanogram for sagittal imbalance of the spine: low dose alternative for a safer diagnosis.
    Weisz GM; Albury WR; Houang MD; Matucci-Cerinic M
    Curr Rheumatol Rev; 2014; 10(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 25229500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The oblique view: an unnecessary component of the initial adult lumbar spine examination.
    Rhea JT; DeLuca SA; Llewellyn HJ; Boyd RJ
    Radiology; 1980 Jan; 134(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 7350633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria.
    Almén A; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Besjakov J; Kheddache S; Lanhede B; Månsson LG; Zankl M
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Nov; 73(875):1192-9. PubMed ID: 11144797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reduction of radiation risks in patients undergoing some X-ray examinations by using optimal projections: A Monte Carlo program-based mathematical calculation.
    Chaparian A; Kanani A; Baghbanian M
    J Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 39(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 24600170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Lateral dual-energy radiography: artifact error from rib and pelvic bone.
    Rupich RC; Griffin MG; Pacifici R; Avioli LV; Susman N
    J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Jan; 7(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 1549963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Image quality and dose in lumbar spine examinations: results of a 5 year quality control programme following the European quality criteria trial.
    Vañó E; Oliete S; González L; Guibelalde E; Velasco A; Fernández JM
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Dec; 68(816):1332-35. PubMed ID: 8777594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Does collimation affect patient dose in antero-posterior thoraco-lumbar spine?
    Robinson JB; Ali RM; Tootell AK; Hogg P
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):211-215. PubMed ID: 28687288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radiation dose exposure for lumbar spine epidural steroid injections: a comparison of conventional fluoroscopy data and CT fluoroscopy techniques.
    Hoang JK; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Gray L; Gafton AR; Huh BK; Eastwood JD; Lascola CD; Hurwitz LM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Oct; 197(4):778-82. PubMed ID: 21940563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Reduction of radiation exposure by the use of fluoroscopic guidance in transpedicular instrumentation].
    Hart R; Komzák M; Bárta R; Okál F; Srůtková E
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 22094160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Measurement of entrance skin dose and estimation of organ dose during pediatric chest radiography.
    Kumaresan M; Kumar R; Biju K; Choubey A; Kantharia S
    Health Phys; 2011 Jun; 100(6):654-7. PubMed ID: 22004934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of medical radiographs: extent of variation and associated active bone marrow doses.
    McNeil BJ; Tihansky D; Wennberg JE
    Radiology; 1985 Jul; 156(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 4001422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The prone position for CT of the lumbar spine.
    Tehranzadeh J; Gabriele OF
    Radiology; 1984 Sep; 152(3):817-8. PubMed ID: 6235538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimisation of patient dose for the horizontal beam technique in lateral lumbar spine radiographic examinations.
    Davis AT; Hopkins SA
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 86(1027):20130053. PubMed ID: 23652542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Man and the chair - radiography of the lumbar vertebrae and pelvis in sitting position].
    Decker K
    Radiologe; 1984 Mar; 24(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 6709892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lowering patient dose on single-phase X-ray units.
    Fung K
    Radiol Technol; 1995; 66(3):159-64; quiz 165-6. PubMed ID: 7708914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Routine oblique radiography of the pediatric lumbar spine: is it necessary?
    Roberts FF; Kishore PR; Cunningham ME
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Aug; 131(2):297-8. PubMed ID: 98011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry of the lumbar spine: cadaver study.
    Ho CP; Kim RW; Schaffler MB; Sartoris DJ
    Radiology; 1990 Jul; 176(1):171-3. PubMed ID: 2353087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.