These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Artifacts in mammography: ways to identify and overcome them. Chaloeykitti L; Muttarak M; Ng KH Singapore Med J; 2006 Jul; 47(7):634-40; quiz 641. PubMed ID: 16810441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control. Friedrich MA Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography quality assurance from A to Z. Farria DM; Bassett LW; Kimme-Smith C; DeBruhl N Radiographics; 1994 Mar; 14(2):371-85. PubMed ID: 8190960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality assurance in mammography: artifact analysis. Hogge JP; Palmer CH; Muller CC; Little ST; Smith DC; Fatouros PP; de Paredes ES Radiographics; 1999; 19(2):503-22. PubMed ID: 10194792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artifacts in digital mammography. Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Legislative and regulatory mandates for mammography quality assurance. Fintor L; Alciati MH; Fischer R J Public Health Policy; 1995; 16(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 7738160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and implementation of a quality assurance program for mammography. de Paredes ES; Frazier AB; Hartwell GD; Strash AM; Scheer C; Smith DC; Barnette PA; Noel W; Kenneweg D Radiology; 1987 Apr; 163(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 3823463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The procedures and results of a quality control program in mammography carried out on a regional basis]. Milano F; Rosselli Del Turco M; Maggi E; Certo N; Morrone D; Lazzeri B Radiol Med; 1996 Mar; 91(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 8628928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of mammographic image quality: pilot study comparing five methods. Caldwell CB; Fishell EK; Jong RA; Weiser WJ; Yaffe MJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Aug; 159(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 1632343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comments on the standards for acceptance and consistency testing of systems for digital radiography]. Schätzl M; Braunschweig R; Hoppe T; Lenzen H; Schenk H; Schramm H; Streng W; von Volkmann T; Kamm KF Rofo; 2005 Sep; 177(9):1297-304. PubMed ID: 16123878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reference levels for image quality in mammography. Zdesar U Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):170-2. PubMed ID: 18375465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technological improvements in mammography over the past 20 years. Haus AG Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 8302212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality assurance in screening mammography. Health Devices; 1990; 19(5-6):152-98. PubMed ID: 2372321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image quality and dose in mammography in 17 countries in Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe: results from IAEA projects. Ciraj-Bjelac O; Avramova-Cholakova S; Beganovic A; Economides S; Faj D; Gershan V; Grupetta E; Kharita MH; Milakovic M; Milu C; Muhogora WE; Muthuvelu P; Oola S; Setayeshi S; Schandorf C; Ursulean I; Videnovic IR; Zaman A; Ziliukas J; Rehani MM Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2161-8. PubMed ID: 21665395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Denoising and enhancing digital mammographic images for visual screening. Scharcanski J; Jung CR Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006 Jun; 30(4):243-54. PubMed ID: 16839742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast exposure: nationwide trends; a mammographic quality assurance program--results to date. Jensen JE; Butler PF Radiol Technol; 1978; 50(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 264140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]