These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8284382)
1. MR angiography of the pelvis with variable velocity encoding and a phased-array coil. Swan JS; Grist TM; Weber DM; Sproat IA; Wojtowycz MM Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):363-9. PubMed ID: 8284382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR angiography of normal pelvic arteries: comparison of signal intensity and contrast-to-noise ratio for three different inflow techniques. Yucel EK; Silver MS; Carter AP AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 8010214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fast spin-echo MR images of the pelvis obtained with a phased-array coil: value in localizing and staging prostatic carcinoma. Kier R; Wain S; Troiano R AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Sep; 161(3):601-6. PubMed ID: 8352116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peripheral MR angiography with variable velocity encoding. Work in progress. Swan JS; Weber DM; Grist TM; Wojtowycz MM; Korosec FR; Mistretta CA Radiology; 1992 Sep; 184(3):813-7. PubMed ID: 1509072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Renal magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla using a 32-element phased-array coil system and parallel imaging in 2 directions. Fenchel M; Nael K; Deshpande VS; Finn JP; Kramer U; Miller S; Ruehm S; Laub G Invest Radiol; 2006 Sep; 41(9):697-703. PubMed ID: 16896305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of using endorectal coil in preoperative staging of rectal carcinomas by pelvic MR imaging. Donmez FY; Tunaci M; Yekeler E; Balik E; Tunaci A; Acunas G Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jul; 67(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 17720346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the use of the transrectal surface coil and the pelvic phased-array coil in MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of uterine cervical carcinoma. Kim MJ; Chung JJ; Lee YH; Lee JT; Yoo HS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1215-21. PubMed ID: 9129414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate MR imaging at 3T with a longitudinal array endorectal surface coil and phased array body coil. Kim DY; Schnall MD; Rosen MA; Connick T J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 27(6):1327-30. PubMed ID: 18504745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance imaging techniques in the pelvis. Outwater EK; Mitchell DG Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 May; 2(2):161-88. PubMed ID: 7489284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging at 3T using a standard quadrature head coil and eight-channel phased-array coil with and without SENSE reconstruction. Lupo JM; Lee MC; Han ET; Cha S; Chang SM; Berger MS; Nelson SJ J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Sep; 24(3):520-9. PubMed ID: 16888776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [High resolution MR imaging of the hip using pelvic phased-array coil]. Niitsu M; Mishima H; Itai Y Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1997 Jan; 57(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 9038065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of a three-station phased array coil to improve peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Leiner T; Nijenhuis RJ; Maki JH; Lemaire E; Hoogeveen R; van Engelshoven JM J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Sep; 20(3):417-25. PubMed ID: 15332249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR imaging of the abdomen with a phased-array multicoil: prospective clinical evaluation. Campeau NG; Johnson CD; Felmlee JP; Rydberg JN; Butts RK; Ehman RL; Riederer SJ Radiology; 1995 Jun; 195(3):769-76. PubMed ID: 7754009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of multistation MR angiography with integrated parallel acquisition technique versus conventional technique with a dedicated phased-array coil system in peripheral vascular disease. Hagspiel KD; Yao L; Shih MC; Burkholder B; Bissonette E; Harthun NL J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Feb; 17(2 Pt 1):263-9. PubMed ID: 16517771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flow quantification using fast cine phase-contrast MR imaging, conventional cine phase-contrast MR imaging, and Doppler sonography: in vitro and in vivo validation. Lee VS; Spritzer CE; Carroll BA; Pool LG; Bernstein MA; Heinle SK; MacFall JR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1125-31. PubMed ID: 9308476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cardiac cine imaging at 3 Tesla: initial experience with a 32-element body-array coil. Fenchel M; Deshpande VS; Nael K; Finn JP; Miller S; Ruehm S; Laub G Invest Radiol; 2006 Aug; 41(8):601-8. PubMed ID: 16829742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging. Beyersdorff D; Taymoorian K; Knösel T; Schnorr D; Felix R; Hamm B; Bruhn H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1214-20. PubMed ID: 16247137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hybrid phased array for improved internal auditory canal imaging at 3.0-T MR. Kocharian A; Lane JI; Bernstein MA; Lin C; Witte RJ; Huston J; Felmlee JP J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Sep; 16(3):300-4. PubMed ID: 12205586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Functional MR angiography using phase contrast imaging technique at 3T MRI. Kang CK; Kim SH; Lee H; Park CA; Kim YB; Cho ZH Neuroimage; 2010 Apr; 50(3):1036-43. PubMed ID: 20083204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional breathhold SSFP coronary MRA: a comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T. Bi X; Deshpande V; Simonetti O; Laub G; Li D J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Aug; 22(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 16028242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]