These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8286099)

  • 1. Aerodynamic characteristics of the Provox low-resistance indwelling voice prosthesis.
    Hilgers FJ; Cornelissen MW; Balm AJ
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 250(7):375-8. PubMed ID: 8286099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro and in vivo comparison of the low-resistance Groningen and the Provox tracheosophageal voice prostheses.
    Chung RP; Patel P; Ter Keurs M; Van Lith Bijl JT; Mahieu HF
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 10089797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. First clinical experience with a new non-indwelling voice prosthesis (Provox NID) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.
    Hancock K; Houghton B; Van As-Brooks CJ; Coman W
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Sep; 125(9):981-90. PubMed ID: 16109676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo aerodynamic characteristics of the Nijdam voice prosthesis.
    Van den Hoogen FJ; Veenstra A; Verkerke GJ; Schutte HK; Manni JJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 Nov; 117(6):897-902. PubMed ID: 9442834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in aerodynamic characteristics of new and dysfunctional Provox 2 voice prostheses in vivo.
    Schwandt LQ; Tjong-Ayong HJ; van Weissenbruch R; der Mei HC; Albers FW
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 263(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 16421748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aerodynamic characteristics of the Nijdam voice prosthesis in relation to tracheo-esophageal wall thickness.
    Veenstra A; van den Hoogen FJ; Schutte HK; Nijdam HF; Manni JJ; Verkerke GJ
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1997; 254(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 9115703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new low-resistance, self-retaining prosthesis (Provox) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.
    Hilgers FJ; Schouwenburg PF
    Laryngoscope; 1990 Nov; 100(11):1202-7. PubMed ID: 2233085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective clinical phase II study of two new indwelling voice prostheses (Provox Vega 22.5 and 20 Fr) and a novel anterograde insertion device (Provox Smart Inserter).
    Hilgers FJ; Ackerstaff AH; Jacobi I; Balm AJ; Tan IB; van den Brekel MW
    Laryngoscope; 2010 Jun; 120(6):1135-43. PubMed ID: 20513030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical phase I/feasibility study of the next generation indwelling Provox voice prosthesis (Provox Vega).
    Hilgers FJ; Ackerstaff AH; van Rossum M; Jacobi I; Balm AJ; Tan IB; van den Brekel MW
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Apr; 130(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 19895334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the Provox Flush, blowing and imitated coughing on voice prosthetic biofilms in vitro.
    Free RH; Van der Mei HC; Elving GJ; Van Weissenbruch R; Albers FW; Busscher HJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 May; 123(4):547-51. PubMed ID: 12797592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Groningen, Nijdam and Provox voice prostheses: a prospective clinical comparison based on 845 replacements.
    Van Den Hoogen FJ; Oudes MJ; Hombergen G; Nijdam HF; Manni JJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1996 Jan; 116(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 8820362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The ultra-low resistance Groningen voice prosthesis: aerodynamic properties.
    Chung RP; Geskus J; Mahieu HF
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1999; 120(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 10668359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic behavior of the Provox and Staffieri prostheses for voice rehabilitation following total laryngectomy.
    Miani C; Bellomo A; Bertino G; Staffieri A; Carello M; Belforte G
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1998; 255(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 9561863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Voice restoration with voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy. Assessment of survival time of 378 Provox-1, Provox-2 and Blom-Singer voice prosthesis].
    Schäfer P; Klützke N; Schwerdtfeger FP
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Nov; 80(11):677-81. PubMed ID: 11702284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Medical after-care of laryngectomized patients with voice prosthesis].
    Schultz-Coulon HJ
    HNO; 1993 Dec; 41(12):597-608. PubMed ID: 8125806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors influencing the longevity and replacement frequency of Provox voice prostheses.
    Yenigun A; Eren SB; Ozkul MH; Tugrul S; Meric A
    Singapore Med J; 2015 Nov; 56(11):632-6. PubMed ID: 26668409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Nijdam voice prosthesis: a self-retaining valveless voice prosthesis for vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.
    van den Hoogen FJ; Nijdam HF; Veenstra A; Manni JJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1996 Nov; 116(6):913-7. PubMed ID: 8973732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multi-institutional assessment of the Provox 2 voice prosthesis.
    Ackerstaff AH; Hilgers FJ; Meeuwis CA; van der Velden LA; van den Hoogen FJ; Marres HA; Vreeburg GC; Manni JJ
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1999 Feb; 125(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 10037283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aerodynamic and sound intensity measurements in tracheoesophageal voice.
    Grolman W; Eerenstein SE; Tan FM; Tange RA; Schouwenburg PF
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2007; 69(2):68-76. PubMed ID: 17127821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are modern voice prostheses better? A lifetime comparison of 749 voice prostheses.
    Kress P; Schäfer P; Schwerdtfeger FP; Rösler S
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jan; 271(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 23812585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.