245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8288283)
1. Relationship between dipole parameter estimation errors and measurement conditions in magnetoencephalography.
Ogura Y; Sekihara K
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Sep; 40(9):919-24. PubMed ID: 8288283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Current dipole localization with an ideal magnetometer system.
Lütkenhöner B
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Nov; 43(11):1049-61. PubMed ID: 9214823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Confidence limits of dipole source reconstruction results.
Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 115(6):1442-51. PubMed ID: 15134713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dipole separability in a neuromagnetic source analysis.
Lütkenhöner B
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 May; 45(5):572-81. PubMed ID: 9581055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simulation studies of multiple dipole neuromagnetic source localization: model order and limits of source resolution.
Supek S; Aine CJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jun; 40(6):529-40. PubMed ID: 8262534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation of postaverage SNR from evoked responses under nonstationary noise.
Silva I
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Aug; 56(8):2123-30. PubMed ID: 19403358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The coupled dipole model: an integrated model for multiple MEG/EEG data sets.
Bijma F; de Munck JC; Böcker KB; Huizenga HM; Heethaar RM
Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):890-904. PubMed ID: 15528089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of measurement conditions on MCG inverse solutions.
Tan GA; Brauer F; Stroink G; Purcell CJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Sep; 39(9):921-7. PubMed ID: 1473820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Searching for the best model: ambiguity of inverse solutions and application to fetal magnetoencephalography.
Vrba J; Robinson SE; McCubbin J; Lowery CL; Eswaran H; Murphy P; Preissl H
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):757-76. PubMed ID: 17228119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Global optimization in the localization of neuromagnetic sources.
Uutela K; Hämäläinen M; Salmelin R
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Jun; 45(6):716-23. PubMed ID: 9609936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. EEG minimum-norm estimation compared with MEG dipole fitting in the localization of somatosensory sources at S1.
Komssi S; Huttunen J; Aronen HJ; Ilmoniemi RJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):534-42. PubMed ID: 15036048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distinguishing between moving and stationary sources using EEG/MEG measurements with an application to epilepsy.
Yetik IS; Nehorai A; Lewine JD; Muravchik CH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 52(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 15759577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Thermal noise calculation method for precise estimation of the signal-to-noise ratio of ultra-low-field MRI with an atomic magnetometer.
Yamashita T; Oida T; Hamada S; Kobayashi T
J Magn Reson; 2012 Feb; 215():100-8. PubMed ID: 22261121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Noise covariance incorporated MEG-MUSIC algorithm: a method for multiple-dipole estimation tolerant of the influence of background brain activity.
Sekihara K; Poeppel D; Marantz A; Koizumi H; Miyashita Y
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Sep; 44(9):839-47. PubMed ID: 9282476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Average-intensity reconstruction and Wiener reconstruction of bioelectric current distribution based on its estimated covariance matrix.
Sekihara K; Scholz B
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Feb; 42(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 7868142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Statistical performance analysis of signal variance-based dipole models for MEG/EEG source localization and detection.
Rodríguez-Rivera A; Van Veen BD; Wakai RT
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 50(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 12665027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Localization of realistic cortical activity in MEG using current multipoles.
Jerbi K; Baillet S; Mosher JC; Nolte G; Garnero L; Leahy RM
Neuroimage; 2004 Jun; 22(2):779-93. PubMed ID: 15193607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The magnetic field inside special conducting geometries due to internal current.
Heller L; Ranken D; Best E
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Aug; 51(8):1310-8. PubMed ID: 15311815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Precision, signal-to-noise ratio, and dose optimization of magnitude and phase arterial input functions in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Kotys MS; Akbudak E; Markham J; Conturo TE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):598-611. PubMed ID: 17326084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
