These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8288432)

  • 1. Assessing technology assessment. Early results of the Quebec experience.
    Jacob R; Battista RN
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1993; 9(4):564-72. PubMed ID: 8288432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health technology assessment.
    Kearney B
    J Qual Clin Pract; 1996 Sep; 16(3):131-43. PubMed ID: 8887856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomedical research councils. Their role and function in transferring information.
    Belaisch F
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1988; 4(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 10287112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: a way to increase impact.
    McGregor M; Brophy JM
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 15921068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Managing medical technology: lessons for the United States from Quebec and France.
    Rosenau PV
    Int J Health Serv; 2000; 30(3):617-39. PubMed ID: 11109185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the performance of health technology assessment organizations: a framework.
    Lafortune L; Farand L; Mondou I; Sicotte C; Battista R
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18218172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health care technology in Canada (with special reference to Quebec).
    Battista RN; Jacob R; Hodge MJ
    Health Policy; 1994; 30(1-3):73-122. PubMed ID: 10139497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Priority setting for health technology assessment. Theoretical considerations and practical approaches. Priority setting Subgroup of the EUR-ASSESS Project.
    Henshall C; Oortwijn W; Stevens A; Granados A; Banta D
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1997; 13(2):144-85. PubMed ID: 9194351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A nice try that fails: the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU) evaluation of the effect of treatment of alcohol and drug problems: the epidemiologist's view.
    Poikolainen K
    Alcohol Alcohol; 2002; 37(5):416-8. PubMed ID: 12217929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sickness absence: causes, consequences, and physicians' sickness certification practice. A systematic literature review by the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU).
    Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care
    Scand J Public Health Suppl; 2004; 63():3-263. PubMed ID: 15513647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health technology assessment in Australia: a need to re-focus.
    Hailey DM
    J Qual Clin Pract; 1996 Sep; 16(3):123-9. PubMed ID: 8887855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The metabolism of change.
    Flower J; Guillaume P
    Physician Exec; 2001; 27(4):52-4. PubMed ID: 11481894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The New York State Task Force on Clinical Guidelines and Medical Technology Assessment.
    Servis KW; Ferarra EP
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1996 Feb; 22(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 8646302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health care technology assessment in The Netherlands.
    Gelijns AC; Rigter H
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1990; 6(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 2361817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using technology to help obtain the goals of palliative care.
    Seymour J
    Int J Palliat Nurs; 2005 May; 11(5):240-1. PubMed ID: 15944498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment.
    Battista RN; Feeny DH; Hodge MJ
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1995; 11(1):102-16. PubMed ID: 7706007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Harnessing technology to benefit nursing.
    Honey M; Carr R; Irvine D; Westbrooke L
    Nurs N Z; 2010 Nov; 16(10):24-5. PubMed ID: 21250619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment and regulation of health care technology. The Dutch experience.
    Boer A
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(4):638-48. PubMed ID: 10645105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care.
    Bloom BS; Banta HD; Gross PF; Peña-Mohr J; Sisk JE; Stocking B
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1989; 5(1):154-8. PubMed ID: 10292538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Report from the Conseil d'Evaluation des Technologies de la Santé (CETS). Mandate of the conseil.
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1992; 8(2):366. PubMed ID: 1628918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.