These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8289530)

  • 1. Assessment of health information technology: which questions for which systems? Proposal for a taxonomy.
    Grémy F; Degoulet P
    Med Inform (Lond); 1993; 18(3):185-93. PubMed ID: 8289530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the quality of medical information technology economic evaluations: room for improvement.
    Eisenstein EL; Ortiz M; Anstrom KJ; Crosslin DR; Lobach DF
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():234-8. PubMed ID: 17238338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economic evaluation in medical information technology: why the numbers don't add up.
    Eisenstein EL; Ortiz M; Anstrom KJ; Crosslin DR; Lobach DF
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():914. PubMed ID: 17238533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of health information systems-problems and challenges.
    Ammenwerth E; Gräber S; Herrmann G; Bürkle T; König J
    Int J Med Inform; 2003 Sep; 71(2-3):125-35. PubMed ID: 14519405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the social impacts of medical technologies.
    Banta HD; Sanes JR
    J Community Health; 1978; 3(3):245-58. PubMed ID: 721958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems.
    Kushniruk AW; Patel VL
    J Biomed Inform; 2004 Feb; 37(1):56-76. PubMed ID: 15016386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolving Health IT Systems Evaluation: The Convergence of Health Informatics and HTA.
    Doupi P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 222():220-36. PubMed ID: 27198105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical technologies can carry big payoff, big costs. How to assess needs and build strategies.
    Carpenter D
    Hosp Health Netw; 2008 May; 82(5):suppl 4-7. PubMed ID: 18557340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Medical technology evaluation becomes necessary in order to limit health care costs].
    Schwarz E
    Tandlaegebladet; 1981 Jan; 85(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 6944810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating evaluations of new health technologies.
    Sisk JE
    Pharmacoeconomics; 1993 Jun; 3(6):511-2. PubMed ID: 10147130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost escalation in health-care technology--possible solutions.
    Járos GG; Boonzaier DA
    S Afr Med J; 1993 Jun; 83(6):420-2. PubMed ID: 8211460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implementation fidelity: a framework for evaluation in the health information technology field.
    Eisenstein EL; Lobach DF; Montgomery P; Kawamoto K; Anstrom KJ
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; ():949. PubMed ID: 18694049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. E-health interventions as complex interventions: improving the quality of methods of assessment.
    Holbrook AM; Thabane L; Shcherbatykh IY; O'Reilly D
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():952. PubMed ID: 17238571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medical technologies: concern about and assurance of value.
    McNeil BJ
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Sep; 5 Suppl 2():S257-8. PubMed ID: 9750825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The PHM-Ethics methodology: interdisciplinary technology assessment of personal health monitoring.
    Schmidt S; Verweij M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 187():13-20. PubMed ID: 23920452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation in health informatics: social network analysis.
    Anderson JG
    Comput Biol Med; 2002 May; 32(3):179-93. PubMed ID: 11922934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technology assessment in Catalonia: integrating economic appraisal.
    Granados A; Borràs JM
    Soc Sci Med; 1994 Jun; 38(12):1643-6. PubMed ID: 8047922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of technology on health care costs.
    Cotterill PG
    Profile Med Pract; 1980; ():107-21. PubMed ID: 10309443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A proposal to use a balanced scorecard to evaluate Information for Health: an information strategy for the modern NHS (1998-2005).
    Protti D
    Comput Biol Med; 2002 May; 32(3):221-36. PubMed ID: 11922937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethical perspectives in evaluation of telehealth.
    Cornford T; Klecun-Dabrowska E
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2001; 10(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 11302093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.