These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8290188)

  • 1. Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents.
    Fletcher H; Mitchell S; Frederick J; Simeon D; Brown D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 8290188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH; Chang FM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R; Greaves PC
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oral misoprostol vs. intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial.
    Gherman RB; Browning J; O'Boyle A; Goodwin TM
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jul; 46(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 11499184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of intracervical and intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction in patients with an unfavourable cervix.
    Srisomboon J; Piyamongkol W; Aiewsakul P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1997 Mar; 80(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 9175387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices.
    Buser D; Mora G; Arias F
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):581-5. PubMed ID: 9083316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of glyceryl trinitrate, misoprostol, and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening in term pregnancy.
    Sharma Y; Kumar S; Mittal S; Misra R; Dadhwal V
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Jun; 31(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 15916656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
    Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Induction of labor with misoprostol in pregnancies with advanced maternal age.
    Zeteroglu S; Sahin GH; Sahin HA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Dec; 129(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 16406221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening in the third trimester of pregnancy].
    Wang Z; Li W; Ouyang W
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Jun; 32(6):326-8. PubMed ID: 9596908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Induction of labor in great grandmultipara with misoprostol.
    Zeteroglu S; Sahin HG; Sahin HA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 May; 126(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 16129547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction.
    Garry D; Figueroa R; Kalish RB; Catalano CJ; Maulik D
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Apr; 13(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 12854927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol.
    Rust OA; Greybush M; Atlas RO; Jones KJ; Balducci J
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):899-904. PubMed ID: 11725734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of misoprostol for cervical ripening.
    Katz VL; Farmer RM; Dean CA; Carpenter ME
    South Med J; 2000 Sep; 93(9):881-4. PubMed ID: 11005347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison].
    Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labour.
    Kulshreshtha S; Sharma P; Mohan G; Singh S; Singh S
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2007; 51(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 17877293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.