These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8290334)

  • 1. Relative and absolute duration judgments under prospective and retrospective paradigms.
    Zakay D
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Nov; 54(5):656-64. PubMed ID: 8290334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review.
    Block RA; Hancock PA; Zakay D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):330-43. PubMed ID: 20403583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deliberation's blindsight: how cognitive load can improve judgments.
    Hoffmann JA; von Helversen B; Rieskamp J
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Jun; 24(6):869-79. PubMed ID: 23575598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time judgments as a function of clock duration: effects of temporal paradigm and an attention-demanding nontemporal task.
    Predebon J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Jun; 88(3 Pt 2):1251-4. PubMed ID: 10485109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review.
    Block RA; Zakay D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1997 Jun; 4(2):184-97. PubMed ID: 21331825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sex differences in duration judgments: a meta-analytic review.
    Block RA; Hancock PA; Zakay D
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Dec; 28(8):1333-46. PubMed ID: 11219961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive models that predict physician judgments of capacity to consent in mild Alzheimer's disease.
    Marson DC; Hawkins L; McInturff B; Harrell LE
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Apr; 45(4):458-64. PubMed ID: 9100715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Impact of Affect on Out-Group Judgments Depends on Dominant Information-Processing Styles: Evidence From Incidental and Integral Affect Paradigms.
    Isbell LM; Lair EC; Rovenpor DR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Apr; 42(4):485-97. PubMed ID: 26984013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The mere exposure effect is differentially sensitive to different judgment tasks.
    Seamon JG; McKenna PA; Binder N
    Conscious Cogn; 1998 Mar; 7(1):85-102. PubMed ID: 9521834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time perception, estimation paradigm, and temporal relevance.
    Klapproth F
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Jun; 104(3 Pt 1):749-57. PubMed ID: 17688129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The process of emotion inference.
    Siemer M; Reisenzein R
    Emotion; 2007 Feb; 7(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 17352558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Working memory and spatial judgments: Cognitive load increases the central tendency bias.
    Allred SR; Crawford LE; Duffy S; Smith J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1825-1831. PubMed ID: 27084778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: an executive-control perspective.
    Zakay D; Block RA
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2004; 64(3):319-28. PubMed ID: 15283475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal integration of auditory and vibrotactile information for judgments of temporal order.
    Ley I; Haggard P; Yarrow K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1005-19. PubMed ID: 19653745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating models of remember-know judgments: complexity, mimicry, and discriminability.
    Cohen AL; Rotello CM; Macmillan NA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Oct; 15(5):906-26. PubMed ID: 18926982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociations among judgments do not reflect cognitive priority: an associative explanation of memory for frequency information in contingency learning.
    Vadillo MA; Luque D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Mar; 67(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 22506878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive models of physicians' legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
    Earnst KS; Marson DC; Harrell LE
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 Aug; 48(8):919-27. PubMed ID: 10968295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interevent relationships and judgment under uncertainty: structure determines strategy.
    Sanfey AG; Hastie R
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Sep; 30(6):921-33. PubMed ID: 12450095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for different processes involved in the effects of nontemporal stimulus size and numerical digit value on duration judgments.
    Rammsayer TH; Verner M
    J Vis; 2016 May; 16(7):13. PubMed ID: 27191941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive vs. affective listening modes and judgments of music--an ERP study.
    Brattico E; Jacobsen T; De Baene W; Glerean E; Tervaniemi M
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Dec; 85(3):393-409. PubMed ID: 20837091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.