These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8290334)

  • 21. Enhancing the Wisdom of the Crowd With Cognitive-Process Diversity: The Benefits of Aggregating Intuitive and Analytical Judgments.
    Keck S; Tang W
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Oct; 31(10):1272-1282. PubMed ID: 32960747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Norms Affect Prospective Causal Judgments.
    Henne P; O'Neill K; Bello P; Khemlani S; De Brigard F
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jan; 45(1):e12931. PubMed ID: 33415814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of processing fluency on impressions of familiarity and liking.
    Westerman DL; Lanska M; Olds JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):426-38. PubMed ID: 25528088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimistic bias and pessimistic realism in judgments of contingency with aversive or rewarding outcomes.
    Sonoda A
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Oct; 91(2):445-56. PubMed ID: 12416837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Decision-making models of remember-know judgments: comment on Rotello, Macmillan, and Reeder (2004).
    Murdock B
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Jul; 113(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 16802885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Can tactile stimuli be subitised? An unresolved controversy within the literature on numerosity judgments.
    Gallace A; Tan HZ; Spence C
    Perception; 2008; 37(5):782-800. PubMed ID: 18605150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of training, education, professional experience, and need for cognition on accuracy of exposure assessment decision-making.
    Vadali M; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Apr; 56(3):292-304. PubMed ID: 22186374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Metacognitive judgments-of-learning in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.
    Wojcik DZ; Waterman AH; Lestié C; Moulin CJ; Souchay C
    Autism; 2014 May; 18(4):393-408. PubMed ID: 24151127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sample size bias in retrospective estimates of average duration.
    Smith AR; Rule S; Price PC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 May; 176():39-46. PubMed ID: 28351001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The diminishing criterion model for metacognitive regulation of time investment.
    Ackerman R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Jun; 143(3):1349-68. PubMed ID: 24364687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of time-interval judgement training on real-time measurement of stuttering.
    Cordes AK; Ingham RJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Aug; 42(4):862-79. PubMed ID: 10450907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Effect of Relative Encoding on Memory-Based Judgments.
    Sharif MA; Oppenheimer DM
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Aug; 27(8):1136-45. PubMed ID: 27356963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Confidence-accuracy calibration in absolute and relative face recognition judgments.
    Weber N; Brewer N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Sep; 10(3):156-72. PubMed ID: 15462618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Do changes in the pace of events affect one-off judgments of duration?
    Darlow HM; Dylman AS; Gheorghiu AI; Matthews WJ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59847. PubMed ID: 23555804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of target group size on risk judgments and comparative optimism: the more, the riskier.
    Price PC; Smith AR; Lench HC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Mar; 90(3):382-98. PubMed ID: 16594826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Time and moral judgment.
    Suter RS; Hertwig R
    Cognition; 2011 Jun; 119(3):454-8. PubMed ID: 21354557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Judgments relative to patterns: how temporal sequence patterns affect judgments and memory.
    Kusev P; Ayton P; van Schaik P; Tsaneva-Atanasova K; Stewart N; Chater N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1874-86. PubMed ID: 21967269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can cognitive psychological research on reasoning enhance the discussion around moral judgments?
    Bialek M; Terbeck S
    Cogn Process; 2016 Aug; 17(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 27016146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of nontemporal stimulus size on perceived duration as assessed by the method of reproduction.
    Rammsayer TH; Verner M
    J Vis; 2014 May; 14(5):17. PubMed ID: 24879864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.