These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8291421)

  • 21. Association between fixation technique and revision risk in total hip arthroplasty patients younger than 55 years of age. Results from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association.
    Pedersen AB; Mehnert F; Havelin LI; Furnes O; Herberts P; Kärrholm J; Garellick G; Mäkela K; Eskelinen A; Overgaard S
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2014 May; 22(5):659-67. PubMed ID: 24631923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Predictive factors of aseptic loosening of cemented total hip prostheses].
    Kochbati R; Rbai H; Jlailia M; Makhlouf H; Bouguira A; Daghfous MS
    Pan Afr Med J; 2016; 24():260. PubMed ID: 27800113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Partially cemented AncaDualFit hip stems do not fail in simulated active patients.
    Cristofolini L; Erani P; Teutonico AS; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Feb; 22(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 17070631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in teenage patients: the ultimate challenge.
    Wroblewski BM; Purbach B; Siney PD; Fleming PA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Apr; 92(4):486-8. PubMed ID: 20357322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Long-term comparison of Charnley and Stanmore design total hip replacements.
    Britton AR; Murray DW; Bulstrode CJ; McPherson K; Denham RA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 Sep; 78(5):802-8. PubMed ID: 8836075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Furlong hydroxyapatite-coated hip prosthesis vs the Charnley cemented hip prosthesis.
    Chandran P; Azzabi M; Miles J; Andrews M; Bradley J
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Jan; 25(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 19056219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Durability of the cemented femoral stem in patients 60 to 80 years old.
    Rasquinha VJ; Ranawat CS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Feb; (419):115-23. PubMed ID: 15021141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of cup outer sizes on the contact mechanics and cement fixation of cemented total hip replacements.
    Hua X; Li J; Wang L; Wilcox R; Fisher J; Jin Z
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Oct; 37(10):1008-14. PubMed ID: 26343226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Emperion noncemented modular femoral component--can modularity solve any primary total hip replacement problem?
    Marwin S
    Orthopedics; 2008 Dec; 31(12 Suppl 2):. PubMed ID: 19298024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cost savings of using a cemented total hip replacement: an analysis of the National Joint Registry data.
    Griffiths EJ; Stevenson D; Porteous MJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Aug; 94(8):1032-5. PubMed ID: 22844042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. LUMiC
    Bus MP; Szafranski A; Sellevold S; Goryn T; Jutte PC; Bramer JA; Fiocco M; Streitbürger A; Kotrych D; van de Sande MA; Dijkstra PD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):686-695. PubMed ID: 27020434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Conservative femoral implants. Short stems].
    Valverde-Mordt C; Valverde-Belda D
    Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol; 2012; 56(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 23177948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. New joints for the Millennium: wear control in total replacement hip joints.
    Dowson D
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2001; 215(4):335-58. PubMed ID: 11521758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of surgical impaction technique and how it affects locking strength of the head-stem taper junction.
    Scholl L; Schmidig G; Faizan A; TenHuisen K; Nevelos J
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Jul; 230(7):661-7. PubMed ID: 27107031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Innovation in total hip replacement--when is new better?
    Walker PS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2000 Dec; (381):9-25. PubMed ID: 11127675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. 100 cemented versus 100 noncemented stems with comparison of 25 matched pairs.
    D'Lima DD; Oishi CS; Petersilge WJ; Colwell CW; Walker RH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Mar; (348):140-8. PubMed ID: 9553546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Current methods of preventing aseptic loosening and improving osseointegration of titanium implants in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a review.
    Apostu D; Lucaciu O; Berce C; Lucaciu D; Cosma D
    J Int Med Res; 2018 Jun; 46(6):2104-2119. PubMed ID: 29098919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A novel locking screw hip stem to achieve immediate stability in total hip arthroplasty: A biomechanical study.
    Grechenig S; Gueorguiev B; Berner A; Heiss P; Müller M; Nerlich M; Schmitz P
    Injury; 2015 Oct; 46 Suppl 4():S83-7. PubMed ID: 26542871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Wear in total hip and knee replacements.
    Schmalzried TP; Callaghan JJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):115-36. PubMed ID: 9973062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.
    Behairy YM; Harris WH
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Oct; 23(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 12436120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.