These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8293018)

  • 21. Age differences in dual-task performance after practice.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Psychol Aging; 2007 Sep; 22(3):596-606. PubMed ID: 17874957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Physiological changes during computer tasks: responses to mental load or to motor demands?
    Kohlisch O; Schaefer F
    Ergonomics; 1996 Feb; 39(2):213-24. PubMed ID: 8851526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visual verbal working memory processing may be interfered by previously seen faces.
    Gonzalez-Garrido AA; Ramos-Loyo J; Gomez-Velazquez FR; Alvelais Alarcón M; Moises de la Serna Tuya J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 17555835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Differential working memory load effects after mild traumatic brain injury.
    McAllister TW; Sparling MB; Flashman LA; Guerin SJ; Mamourian AC; Saykin AJ
    Neuroimage; 2001 Nov; 14(5):1004-12. PubMed ID: 11697932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of age, task, and frequency on variability of finger tapping.
    Sommervoll Y; Ettema G; Vereijken B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Oct; 113(2):647-61. PubMed ID: 22185079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of aging on control of timing and force of finger tapping.
    Sasaki H; Masumoto J; Inui N
    Motor Control; 2011 Apr; 15(2):175-86. PubMed ID: 21628723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mental workload and visual impairment: differences between pupil, blink, and subjective rating.
    Recarte MA; Pérez E; Conchillo A; Nunes LM
    Span J Psychol; 2008 Nov; 11(2):374-85. PubMed ID: 18988425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load.
    Park S; Kim MS; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17924807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?
    Larsen JD; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1249-68. PubMed ID: 14578082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Task integration in time production.
    Wohldmann EL; Healy AF; Bourne LE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1130-43. PubMed ID: 20436206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Concurrent finger-tapping in mathematically gifted males: evidence for enhanced right hemisphere involvement during linguistic processing.
    O'Boyle MW; Gill HS; Benbow CP; Alexander JE
    Cortex; 1994 Sep; 30(3):519-26. PubMed ID: 7805392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interactions of speech and manual movement in a syncopated task.
    Inui N
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Oct; 105(2):447-57. PubMed ID: 18065066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effects of two matched memory tasks on concurrent finger tapping.
    Towell N; Burton A; Burton E
    Neuropsychologia; 1994 Jan; 32(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 8818160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Follow you, follow me: continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tapping.
    Konvalinka I; Vuust P; Roepstorff A; Frith CD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2220-30. PubMed ID: 20694920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mental arithmetic modulates temporal variabilities of finger-tapping tasks in a tempo-dependent manner.
    Irie S; Watanabe Y; Tachibana A; Sakata N
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13944. PubMed ID: 36042862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retention and adaptive control of force pattern on a finger-tapping sequence with an attenuated force tap.
    Inui N; Katsura Y; Yamanishi M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):925-32. PubMed ID: 11153871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Advanced analysis of finger-tapping performance: a preliminary study.
    Barut C; Kızıltan E; Gelir E; Köktürk F
    Balkan Med J; 2013 Jun; 30(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 25207095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The contribution of tactile reafference to temporal regularity during bimanual finger tapping.
    Drewing K; Hennings M; Aschersleben G
    Psychol Res; 2002 Feb; 66(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 11963279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Visual identification rate in search of a missing stimulus.
    Inamori Y; Inamori R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Aug; 69(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 2780200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Timing of bimanual alternating finger-tapping sequences in adolescents with mental retardation: a pilot study.
    Inui N; Asama K
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Oct; 97(2):398-400. PubMed ID: 14620225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.