683 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8293219)
1. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
Martin PA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
Benshoof J
Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences.
Koslov TI
Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Casey and the resuscitation of Roe v. Wade.
Robertson JA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(5):24-8. PubMed ID: 1428831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(4):174-7, 185. PubMed ID: 1526274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
Goldman EB
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Supreme Court, abortion, and the jurisprudence of class.
Mariner WK
Am J Public Health; 1992 Nov; 82(11):1556-62. PubMed ID: 1443311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape.
Baron CH
Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 2628652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
U.S. Supreme Court
Wests Supreme Court Report; 1992 Jun; 112():2791-885. PubMed ID: 12041291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Jane L. v. Bangerter.
U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D
Fed Suppl; 1992 Dec; 809():865-80. PubMed ID: 11648409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Planned Parenthood v Casey. The impact of the new undue burden standard on reproductive health care.
Benshoof J
JAMA; 1993 May; 269(17):2249-57. PubMed ID: 8474205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bare court majority reaffirms Roe, but standard for reviewing state laws is relaxed.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Jul; (11):1-3. PubMed ID: 12286280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Supreme Court, liberty, and abortion.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 1992 Aug; 327(9):651-4. PubMed ID: 1640971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals.
Benshoof J
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dworkin and Casey on abortion.
Stroud S
Philos Public Aff; 1996; 25(2):140-70. PubMed ID: 11660187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.
Harrison LK; Naylor KL
Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights.
Wing KR
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1990; 15(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 2081895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Undue burden of abortion.
Charo A
Lancet; 1992 Jul; 340(8810):44. PubMed ID: 1351612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The road to moderation: the significance of Webster for legislation restricting abortion.
Wardle LD
Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):376-83. PubMed ID: 2628653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
