These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8293360)
1. Working time of synthetic elastomeric impression material. McConnell RJ; Johnson LN; Gratton DR J Can Dent Assoc; 1994 Jan; 60(1):49-50, 53-4. PubMed ID: 8293360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components. Hondrum SO J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials. Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials during disinfection. Oda Y; Matsumoto T; Sumii T Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 Feb; 36(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 8689737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Working time of elastomeric impression materials: relevance of rheological tests. Balkenhol M; Kanehira M; Finger WJ; Wöstmann B Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):347-52. PubMed ID: 18269123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in elastomeric impression materials. Craig RG; Sun Z Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):138-45. PubMed ID: 9028233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dimensional stability and reproduction of surface detail of tissue conditioning materials. Pissiotis A; Panagiotouni E; Sofou A; Diakoyanni I; Kaloyannides A Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Dec; 3(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 8605503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of commercial elastomeric impression materials. Craig RG; Urquiola NJ; Liu CC Oper Dent; 1990; 15(3):94-104. PubMed ID: 2133933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Working times of elastomeric impression materials according to dimensional stability and detail reproduction. Tan E; Chai J Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(6):541-7. PubMed ID: 8595114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations. Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tear strength of five elastomeric impression materials at two setting times and two tearing rates. Lawson NC; Burgess JO; Litaker M J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(3):186-93. PubMed ID: 18533981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure. Hosseinpour D; Berg JC J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Issues in handling impression materials. Giordano R Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12004656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time. Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A study of the "thixotropic" property of elastomeric impression materials. Chai J; Pang IC Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 8003196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temperature effects on the rheological properties of current polyether and polysiloxane impression materials during setting. Berg JC; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Adán-Plaza S J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 12886208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tear and energy properties of three impression materials. Hondrum SO Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):517-21. PubMed ID: 7748444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]