These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8294892)

  • 1. Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention.
    Giray M; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Dec; 19(6):1278-91. PubMed ID: 8294892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Locus of the redundant-signals effect in bimodal divided attention: a neurophysiological analysis.
    Miller J; Ulrich R; Lamarre Y
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Apr; 63(3):555-62. PubMed ID: 11414141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coactivation of response initiation processes with redundant signals.
    Maslovat D; Hajj J; Carlsen AN
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 May; 675():7-11. PubMed ID: 29555517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 180(4):737-54. PubMed ID: 17333012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17408855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Redundant-signals effects on reaction time, response force, and movement-related potentials in Parkinson's disease.
    Plat FM; Praamstra P; Horstink MW
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Feb; 130(4):533-9. PubMed ID: 10717795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attention and reaction times to signals of uncertain modality.
    Boulter LR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1977 Aug; 3(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 886275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of spatial and selective attention on basic multisensory integration.
    Gondan M; Blurton SP; Hughes F; Greenlee MW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1887-97. PubMed ID: 21967270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Intersensory facilitation: also concomitant visual stimuli can decrease reaction time].
    Dufft CC; Ulrich R
    Z Exp Psychol; 1999; 46(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 10067137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential coactivation in a redundant signals task with weak and strong go/no-go stimuli.
    Minakata K; Gondan M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):922-929. PubMed ID: 29642781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of endogenous and exogenous orientations of attention on inhibition of return in a cross-modal target-target aiming task.
    Lyons J; Glazebrook CM; Keetch KM; Dhillon VP; Elliott D
    J Mot Behav; 2006 May; 38(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16709561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The McGurk effect: An investigation of attentional capacity employing response times.
    Altieri N; Lentz JJ; Townsend JT; Wenger MJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1712-27. PubMed ID: 27188651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Redundancy gain and coactivation in bimodal detection: evidence for the preservation of coactive processing in older adults.
    Bucur B; Allen PA; Sanders RE; Ruthruff E; Murphy MD
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2005 Sep; 60(5):P279-82. PubMed ID: 16131623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transient and sustained effects of an auditory accessory stimulus in a visual go/no go task.
    Nakano Y
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Oct; 95(2):599-605. PubMed ID: 12434856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention to simultaneous unrelated auditory and visual events: behavioral and neural correlates.
    Johnson JA; Zatorre RJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Oct; 15(10):1609-20. PubMed ID: 15716469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):955-965. PubMed ID: 29642783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.