BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8296094)

  • 41. MHC class I chain-related gene A (MICA) polymorphism and the different histological types of cervical cancer.
    Chen JR; Lee YJ; Chen T; Wang KL; Dang CW; Chang SC; Liu HF; Yang YC
    Neoplasma; 2005; 52(5):369-73. PubMed ID: 16151576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Role of DNA ploidy analysis in endometrial adenocarcinoma.
    Jhala DN; Atkinson BF; Balsara GR; Hernandez E; Jhala NC
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2001 Oct; 5(5):267-73. PubMed ID: 11598854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of gene expression in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Contag SA; Gostout BS; Clayton AC; Dixon MH; McGovern RM; Calhoun ES
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Dec; 95(3):610-7. PubMed ID: 15581972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Apoptosis and the expression of Bax and Bcl-2 in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Kokawa K; Shikone T; Otani T; Nakano R
    Cancer; 1999 Apr; 85(8):1799-809. PubMed ID: 10223575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [The relation between human papilloma virus and cellular DNA content in epidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck].
    Rodrigo Tapia JP; Alvarez Alvarez I; Martínez Sánchez JA; Lazo PS; Ramos S; Sampedro Nuño A; Suárez Nieto C
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1996; 47(5):343-7. PubMed ID: 8991398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Tumor DNA content in gallbladder carcinoma.
    Sato Y; Tanaka J; Koyama K; van Gulik TM; Lygidakis NJ; van der Heyde MN
    Hepatogastroenterology; 1993 Aug; 40(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 8406309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Oral contraceptives as risk factors for cervical adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas.
    Lacey JV; Brinton LA; Abbas FM; Barnes WA; Gravitt PE; Greenberg MD; Greene SM; Hadjimichael OC; McGowan L; Mortel R; Schwartz PE; Silverberg SG; Hildesheim A
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1999 Dec; 8(12):1079-85. PubMed ID: 10613340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Flow cytometric analysis of primary and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx.
    Syms CA; Eibling DE; McCoy JP; Barnes L; Emanuel B; Fowler C; Wagner R; Johnson JT
    Laryngoscope; 1995 Feb; 105(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 8544594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [The relationship between DNA content in cervical carcinoma cell and the clinicopathological features].
    Zhang H
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 1989 Jun; 18(2):137-9. PubMed ID: 2582553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [DNA content in cervical cancer cells].
    Avtandilov GG; Kasab'ian SS; Sgibneva OV
    Vopr Onkol; 1974; 20(8):14-7. PubMed ID: 4428639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Flow cytofluorometric evidence for the differential radioresponsiveness of aneuploid and diploid cervix tumours.
    Dyson JE; Joslin CA; Rothwell RI; Quirke P; Khoury GG; Bird CC
    Radiother Oncol; 1987 Mar; 8(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 3575788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. DNA ploidy, grade, and stage in prognosis of uterine cervical cancer.
    Davis JR; Aristizabal S; Way DL; Weiner SA; Hicks MJ; Hagaman RM
    Gynecol Oncol; 1989 Jan; 32(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 2909446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Diagnostic, endocrinological, behavioral, and DNA ploidy differences between squamous cell and adenomatous carcinoma of the cervix uteri.
    Lindström AK; Hellberg D; Bäckström T; Stendahl U
    Oncol Res; 2004; 14(7-8):321-4. PubMed ID: 15301422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Nuclear DNA content and the number of Barr bodies in premalignant and malignant lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Nishiya I; Ishizaki Y; Sasaki M
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 6945007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. DNA content in cervical carcinoma: a flow cytometric assessment of DNA heterogeneity.
    Chang AR; Grignon DJ; Keeney MM; Koster JL; Kirk ME
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1994 Oct; 13(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 7814194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison between flow cytometry and single cell cytophotometry for DNA content analysis of the uterine cervix.
    Strang P; Lindgren A; Stendahl U
    Acta Radiol Oncol; 1985; 24(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 2994391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Characterization of experimentally induced malignant gastrointestinal tumors of rats using DNA-cytophotometry and karyometry].
    Kreuzberg M; Krygier-Stojałkowska A; Barten M
    Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1988; 58(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 2835938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [The prospective analysis of laryngeal cancer growth dynamics in compliance with evaluation of DNA content and ploidy in cytologic material].
    Ziółkowski A; Olszewski WP; Namysłowski G; Gabriel A; Morawski K; Urbaniec P
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2000; 54 Suppl 31():182-5. PubMed ID: 10974879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Laser DNA-flow cytofluorometry in the differential diagnosis and prognosis of the cervix uteri cancer].
    Maliev FM; Bogatyrev VN; Nechushkin MI
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2005 Aug; (8):40-3. PubMed ID: 16218338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cytophotometric and flow cytometric DNA content of isolated glands in gastric neoplasia.
    Kitayama Y; Nakamura S; Sugimura H; Kino I
    Gut; 1995 Apr; 36(4):516-21. PubMed ID: 7737556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.