These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8296462)
21. Motion aftereffect with flickering test stimuli depends on adapting velocity. Ashida H; Osaka N Vision Res; 1995 Jul; 35(13):1825-33. PubMed ID: 7660589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Neural motion after-effects in the cat's striate cortex: orientation selectivity. Hammond P; Pomfrett CJ; Ahmed B Vision Res; 1989; 29(12):1671-83. PubMed ID: 2631388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The contribution of local and global motion adaptation in the repulsive direction aftereffect. Lee ALF J Vis; 2018 Nov; 18(12):2. PubMed ID: 30458510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparing local and remote motion aftereffects. von Grünau M; Dubé S Spat Vis; 1992; 6(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 1486063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sensitive calibration and measurement procedures based on the amplification principle in motion perception. Lu ZL; Sperling G Vision Res; 2001 Aug; 41(18):2355-74. PubMed ID: 11459593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of contrast and adaptation on the perception of the direction and speed of drifting gratings. Müller R; Greenlee MW Vision Res; 1994 Aug; 34(16):2071-92. PubMed ID: 7941406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dual multiple-scale processing for motion in the human visual system. Nishida S; Ledgeway T; Edwards M Vision Res; 1997 Oct; 37(19):2685-98. PubMed ID: 9373668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Visual resolution of motion ambiguity with periodic luminance- and contrast-domain stimuli. Pantle A; Turano K Vision Res; 1992 Nov; 32(11):2093-106. PubMed ID: 1304087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Duration expansion at low luminance levels. Bruno A; Ayhan I; Johnston A J Vis; 2011 Dec; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 22167051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. On-off selectivity and asymmetry in apparent contrast: An adaptation study. Sato H; Motoyoshi I; Sato T J Vis; 2016; 16(1):14. PubMed ID: 26790846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reduction in the motion coherence threshold for the same direction as that perceived during adaptation. Hirahara M Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(28):4623-33. PubMed ID: 17092532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sustained attention is not necessary for velocity adaptation. Morgan M J Vis; 2013 Jul; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 23902752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Local velocity representation: evidence from motion adaptation. Schrater PR; Simoncelli EP Vision Res; 1998 Dec; 38(24):3899-912. PubMed ID: 10211382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The contribution of one-dimensional motion mechanisms to the perceived direction of drifting plaids and their after effects. Alais D; Wenderoth P; Burke D Vision Res; 1994 Jul; 34(14):1823-34. PubMed ID: 7941385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The influence of adaptation on perceived visual location. Whitaker D; Mcgraw PV; Levi DM Vision Res; 1997 Aug; 37(16):2207-16. PubMed ID: 9578903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Complete interocular transfer of motion adaptation effects on motion coherence thresholds. Raymond JE Vision Res; 1993 Sep; 33(13):1865-70. PubMed ID: 8266642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Predicting the motion after-effect from sensitivity loss. Morgan M; Chubb C; Solomon JA Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(15):2412-20. PubMed ID: 16530801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]