These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8296468)

  • 1. Motion contrast and motion integration.
    Zhang J; Yeh SL; De Valois KK
    Vision Res; 1993 Dec; 33(18):2721-32. PubMed ID: 8296468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The cyclopean (stereoscopic) barber pole illusion.
    Patterson R; Bowd C; Donnelly M
    Vision Res; 1998 Jul; 38(14):2119-25. PubMed ID: 9797972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Drifting Edge Illusion: a stationary edge abutting an oriented drifting grating appears to move because of the 'other aperture problem'.
    Caplovitz GP; Paymer NA; Tse PU
    Vision Res; 2008 Oct; 48(22):2403-14. PubMed ID: 18694778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An illusion of relative motion dependent upon spatial frequency and orientation.
    Hine TJ; Cook M; Rogers GT
    Vision Res; 1995 Nov; 35(22):3093-102. PubMed ID: 8533345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Illusory position shift induced by cyclopean motion.
    Murakami I; Kashiwabara Y
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(15):2037-43. PubMed ID: 19481565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Figure ground segregation modulates perceived direction of ambiguous moving gratings and plaids.
    Tommasi L; Vallortigara G
    Vision Res; 1999 Feb; 39(4):777-87. PubMed ID: 10341964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential effect of luminance contrast reduction and noise on motion induction.
    Hanada M
    Perception; 2010; 39(11):1452-65. PubMed ID: 21313943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integration of one- and two-dimensional motion signals in infants: evidence from the barber-pole illusion.
    Dobkins KR; Lewis LB; Fine I
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(20):3360-72. PubMed ID: 16854447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prior depth information can bias motion perception.
    Graf EW; Adams WJ; Lages M
    J Vis; 2004 May; 4(6):427-33. PubMed ID: 15330710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of luminance contrast and phase difference on motion assimilation for sinusoidal gratings.
    Ohtani Y; Ido K; Ejima Y
    Vision Res; 1995 Aug; 35(16):2277-86. PubMed ID: 7571464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Second-order motion shifts perceived position.
    Bressler DW; Whitney D
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):1120-8. PubMed ID: 16359721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Illusory perception of gratings stimulating a small number of neurones.
    Virsu V; Rovamo J; Laurinen P
    Vision Res; 1994 Dec; 34(24):3253-63. PubMed ID: 7863613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two mechanisms that determine the Barber-Pole Illusion.
    Sun P; Chubb C; Sperling G
    Vision Res; 2015 Jun; 111(Pt A):43-54. PubMed ID: 25872181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What is the denominator for contrast normalisation?
    Smith DR; Derrington AM
    Vision Res; 1996 Dec; 36(23):3759-66. PubMed ID: 8994577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The directional tuning of the barber-pole illusion.
    Fisher N; Zanker JM
    Perception; 2001; 30(11):1321-36. PubMed ID: 11768487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strength and variability of the backscroll illusion.
    Fujimoto K; Yagi A; Sato T
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):759-64. PubMed ID: 19236893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occlusion and the solution to visual motion ambiguity: Looking beyond the aperture problem.
    van der Smagt MJ; Stoner GR
    J Vis; 2008 Feb; 8(2):4.1-12. PubMed ID: 18318630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhancement of motion perception in the direction opposite to smooth pursuit eye movement.
    Terao M; Murakami I; Nishida S
    J Vis; 2015; 15(13):2. PubMed ID: 26381833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of the noise level on induced motion.
    Hanada M
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(15):1757-63. PubMed ID: 15135992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attraction of flashes to moving dots.
    Yilmaz O; Tripathy SP; Patel SS; Ogmen H
    Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(20):2603-15. PubMed ID: 17697692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.