These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8296866)

  • 1. Effect of handedness on the middle latency auditory evoked potential.
    Stewart MG; Jerger J; Lew HL
    Am J Otol; 1993 Nov; 14(6):595-600. PubMed ID: 8296866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory middle latency responses differ in right- and left-handed subjects: an evaluation through topographic brain mapping.
    Mohebbi M; Mahmoudian S; Alborzi MS; Najafi-Koopaie M; Farahani ED; Farhadi M
    Am J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 23(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 24811159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Healthy-side dominance of middle- and long-latency neuromagnetic fields in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
    Li LP; Shiao AS; Chen LF; Niddam DM; Chang SY; Lien CF; Lee SK; Hsieh JC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 24(3):937-46. PubMed ID: 16930421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
    Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory-evoked response in the clinically normal dog: middle latency components.
    Sims MH; Moore RE
    Am J Vet Res; 1984 Oct; 45(10):2028-33. PubMed ID: 6497100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Verbal dichotic listening in developmental stuttering: subgroups with atypical auditory processing.
    Foundas AL; Corey DM; Hurley MM; Heilman KM
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2004 Dec; 17(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 15622019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Late auditory evoked potentials asymmetry revisited.
    Hine J; Debener S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 118(6):1274-85. PubMed ID: 17462945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High click stimulus repetition rate in the auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients with normal MRI. Does it improve diagnosis?
    Santos MA; Munhoz MS; Peixoto MA; Silva CS
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2004; 125(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 15605430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory evoked potentials differ at 50 milliseconds in right- and left-handed listeners.
    Hood LJ; Martin DA; Berlin CI
    Hear Res; 1990 Apr; 45(1-2):115-22. PubMed ID: 2345110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Topographic brain mapping of middle latency auditory evoked potentials in normal subjects.
    Comacchio F; Grandori F; Magnavita V; Martini A
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1988; 30():165-72. PubMed ID: 3227263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of stimulus frequency and stimulation site on the N1m response of the human auditory cortex.
    Gabriel D; Veuillet E; Ragot R; Schwartz D; Ducorps A; Norena A; Durrant JD; Bonmartin A; Cotton F; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2004 Nov; 197(1-2):55-64. PubMed ID: 15504604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. P300 component identification in auditory oddball and novel paradigms using source analysis techniques: reduced latency variability in the elderly.
    Maurits NM; Elting JW; Jager DK; van der Hoeven JH; Brouwer WH
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 22(3):166-75. PubMed ID: 15933488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scalp topography and intracerebral sources for ERPs recorded during auditory target detection.
    Shahin AJ; Alain C; Picton TW
    Brain Topogr; 2006; 19(1-2):89-105. PubMed ID: 17136467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of gender and personality traits on individual difference in auditory mismatch: a magnetoencephalographic (MMNm) study.
    Matsubayashi J; Kawakubo Y; Suga M; Takei Y; Kumano S; Fukuda M; Itoh K; Yumoto M; Kasai K
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1236():159-65. PubMed ID: 18725215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early auditory middle latency evoked potentials correlates with recovery from aphasia after stroke.
    Rojas Sosa MC; Fraire Martínez MI; Olvera Gómez JL; Jáuregui-Renaud K
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Jan; 120(1):136-9. PubMed ID: 19027355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of the task of categorizing FM direction on auditory evoked magnetic fields in the human auditory cortex.
    König R; Sieluzycki C; Simserides C; Heil P; Scheich H
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():102-17. PubMed ID: 18420183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic movement of N100m current sources in auditory evoked fields: comparison of ipsilateral versus contralateral responses in human auditory cortex.
    Jin CY; Ozaki I; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Hashimoto I
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Apr; 60(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 18276027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The evaluation of the effect of variable latency periods on the averaged evoked potential].
    Gekhman BI
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1990 Jun; 76(6):726-38. PubMed ID: 2172035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech perception and brain laterality: the effect of ear advantage on auditory event-related potentials.
    Ahonniska J; Cantell M; Tolvanen A; Lyytinen H
    Brain Lang; 1993 Aug; 45(2):127-46. PubMed ID: 8358593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Study of topographic mapping of the auditory middle latency response in the guinea pigs].
    Zhang Y; Jiang S; Gu R
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1994; 29(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 7803091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.