107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8297050)
1. The effects of premolar-extraction: a long-term comparison of outcomes in "clear-cut" extraction and nonextraction Class II patients.
Luppanapornlarp S; Johnston LE
Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(4):257-72. PubMed ID: 8297050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects.
Basciftci FA; Usumez S
Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12607853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in "borderline" Class II patients.
Paquette DE; Beattie JR; Johnston LE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jul; 102(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 1626523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Class II treatment efficiency in maxillary premolar extraction and nonextraction protocols.
Janson G; Barros SE; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):490-8. PubMed ID: 17920502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lip curve changes in males with premolar extraction or nonextraction treatment.
Lin PT; Woods MG
Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):71-86. PubMed ID: 16429877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients.
Stephens CK; Boley JC; Behrents RG; Alexander RG; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 16214626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients.
Germeç D; Taner TU
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 18405818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term profile changes associated with successfully treated extraction and nonextraction Class II Division 1 malocclusions.
Zierhut EC; Joondeph DR; Artun J; Little RM
Angle Orthod; 2000 Jun; 70(3):208-19. PubMed ID: 10926430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The functional impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments: a long-term comparison in patients with "borderline," equally susceptible Class II malocclusions.
Beattie JR; Paquette DE; Johnston LE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 May; 105(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 8166093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Arch width changes in extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients.
Aksu M; Kocadereli I
Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):948-52. PubMed ID: 16448236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A retrospective study of morphologic basis for the extraction decision in Class II, division 1 malocclusion].
Li Q; Zheng Z; Bai D; Pang G
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Nov; 17(4):341-3. PubMed ID: 12539381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Soft-tissue treatment changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusion with and without extraction of maxillary premolars.
Janson G; Fuziy A; de Freitas MR; Castanha Henriques JF; de Almeida RR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):729.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18068588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
Janson G; Janson M; Nakamura A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):861-8. PubMed ID: 18538250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relapse of anterior crowding in patients treated with extraction and nonextraction of premolars.
Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Işiksal E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):775-84. PubMed ID: 16769496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions.
Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Dandajena TC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 17826600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.
Ciger S; Aksu M; Germeç D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonextraction treatment of upper canine-premolar transposition in an adult patient.
Kuroda S; Kuroda Y
Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):472-7. PubMed ID: 15898391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term stability of Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
Janson G; Leon-Salazar V; Leon-Salazar R; Janson M; de Freitas MR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):154.e1-10; discussion 154-5. PubMed ID: 19651339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
Waters D; Harris EF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
