BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8297654)

  • 1. Side-effects of screening.
    Garstin IW; Kaufman Z; Michell MJ; Rodway A; Ebbs SR; Baum M
    Eur J Cancer; 1993; 29A(15):2150-2. PubMed ID: 8297654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic referral patterns for two breast imaging units in Jamaica.
    Soares D; Kirlew K; Johnson P; Reid M
    West Indian Med J; 2007 Mar; 56(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 17910147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Need for open access non-screening mammography in a hospital with a specialist breast clinic service.
    Curtin JJ; Sampson MA
    BMJ; 1992 Feb; 304(6826):549-51. PubMed ID: 1559063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammography requests in general practice during the introduction of nationwide breast cancer screening, 1988-1995.
    Beemsterboer PM; de Koning HJ; Looman CW; Borsboom GJ; Bartelds AI; van der Maas PJ
    Eur J Cancer; 1999 Mar; 35(3):450-4. PubMed ID: 10448298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Referrals to clinical mammography in a county without screening program].
    Birk HO; Henriksen LO; Lindewald H
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Jan; 163(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 11379240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast cancer early diagnosis experience in Florence: can a self referral policy achieve the results of service screening?
    Giorgi D; Paci E; Zappa M; Rosselli del Turco M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Oct; 48(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 7964357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increasing mammography utilization: a controlled study.
    Fletcher SW; Harris RP; Gonzalez JJ; Degnan D; Lannin DR; Strecher VJ; Pilgrim C; Quade D; Earp JA; Clark RL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Jan; 85(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 8418300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mobile mammography: assessment of self-referral in reaching medically underserved women.
    Peek ME; Han J
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2007 Apr; 99(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 17444429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Self-referral for screening mammography.
    Suter LG; Elmore JG
    J Gen Intern Med; 1998 Oct; 13(10):710-3. PubMed ID: 9798820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammographic surveillance of asymptomatic breast cancer relatives in general practice: rate of re-attendance and GP- and patient-related barriers.
    Duijm LE; Guit GL; Zaat JO
    Fam Pract; 1997 Dec; 14(6):450-4. PubMed ID: 9476075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of general practitioner referrals to a specialist breast clinic according to the UK national guidelines.
    Cochrane RA; Singhal H; Monypenny IJ; Webster DJ; Lyons K; Mansel RE
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1997 Jun; 23(3):198-201. PubMed ID: 9236889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Referral for mammography often not according to guideline].
    Lodder-van der Vlies D; Droogh-de Greve K; de Win JL; van der Zaag-Loonen HJ; van Bruggen JA; Markestein HP; Gratama JW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2015; 159():A8636. PubMed ID: 25804111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surveys on mammography frequency in Geneva.
    Lutz JM; Reith-Chaton J; Fioretta G; Cerny V; Bouchardy C
    J Med Screen; 2000; 7(2):111-3. PubMed ID: 11002453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretation.
    Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Ernster V
    JAMA; 1996 Jul; 276(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 8667537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The general practitioner's role in breast cancer screening: a survey in Otago-Southland.
    Miller D; McNoe B; Elwood M; Doyle TC
    N Z Med J; 1998 Feb; 111(1059):24-8. PubMed ID: 9506667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Family physicians' initiative to increase compliance with screening mammography--an innovative community project.
    Eilat-Tsanani S; Sorek M; Gay N; Chaimovitch O; Kulton L; Tabenkin H
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2001 Dec; 3(12):920-4. PubMed ID: 11794915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The demands of screening mammography on surgical inpatient services of breast cancer.
    Paajanen H; Pulliainen L; Hendolin N; Hermunen H; Helle M; Dean PB
    Am Surg; 2001 Jul; 67(7):648-53. PubMed ID: 11450781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rural physicians' perspectives on cervical and breast cancer screening: a gender-based analysis.
    Ahmad F; Stewart DE; Cameron JI; Hyman I
    J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2001 Mar; 10(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 11268303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.