89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8297821)
1. [Comparative genomic hybridization(CGH)].
Matsuta M; Nishiya I
Hum Cell; 1993 Sep; 6(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 8297821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [CGH (comparative genomic hybridization)].
Sakamoto M; Sakamoto H; Suehiro Y; Akiya T; Iwabuchi H; Sakunaga H; Muroya T; Noda T; Sugishita T; Tenjin Y
Nihon Rinsho; 1996 Apr; 54(4):933-43. PubMed ID: 8920653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.
Pinkel D; Segraves R; Sudar D; Clark S; Poole I; Kowbel D; Collins C; Kuo WL; Chen C; Zhai Y; Dairkee SH; Ljung BM; Gray JW; Albertson DG
Nat Genet; 1998 Oct; 20(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 9771718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative genomic hybridization: a rapid new method for detecting and mapping DNA amplification in tumors.
Kallioniemi OP; Kallioniemi A; Sudar D; Rutovitz D; Gray JW; Waldman F; Pinkel D
Semin Cancer Biol; 1993 Feb; 4(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 8448377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization.
du Manoir S; Speicher MR; Joos S; Schröck E; Popp S; Döhner H; Kovacs G; Robert-Nicoud M; Lichter P; Cremer T
Hum Genet; 1993 Feb; 90(6):590-610. PubMed ID: 8444465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization.
du Manoir S; Schröck E; Bentz M; Speicher MR; Joos S; Ried T; Lichter P; Cremer T
Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 7705182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization.
Piper J; Rutovitz D; Sudar D; Kallioniemi A; Kallioniemi OP; Waldman FM; Gray JW; Pinkel D
Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):10-26. PubMed ID: 7705181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hidden gene amplifications in aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas detected by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Wessendorf S; Schwaenen C; Kohlhammer H; Kienle D; Wrobel G; Barth TF; Nessling M; Möller P; Döhner H; Lichter P; Bentz M
Oncogene; 2003 Mar; 22(9):1425-9. PubMed ID: 12618769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of changes in DNA copy number in multiple myeloma.
Rao PH
Methods Mol Med; 2005; 113():71-83. PubMed ID: 15968096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Genetic screening of head-neck carcinomas using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)].
Bockmühl U; Petersen I; Schwendel A; Dietel M
Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jul; 75(7):408-14. PubMed ID: 8924169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors.
Kallioniemi OP; Kallioniemi A; Piper J; Isola J; Waldman FM; Gray JW; Pinkel D
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1994 Aug; 10(4):231-43. PubMed ID: 7522536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of fluorescein isothiocyanate- and Texas red-conjugated nucleotides for direct labeling in comparative genomic hybridization.
Larramendy ML; El-Rifai W; Knuutila S
Cytometry; 1998 Mar; 31(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 9515716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Global search for chromosomal abnormalities in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast using array-comparative genomic hybridization.
Somiari SB; Shriver CD; He J; Parikh K; Jordan R; Hooke J; Hu H; Deyarmin B; Lubert S; Malicki L; Heckman C; Somiari RI
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Dec; 155(2):108-18. PubMed ID: 15571796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of genomic aberrations using comparative genomic hybridization of metaphase chromosomes.
Carless M
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 523():177-202. PubMed ID: 19381938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative genomic hybridization: an overview.
Houldsworth J; Chaganti RS
Am J Pathol; 1994 Dec; 145(6):1253-60. PubMed ID: 7992829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Four-color CGH: a new method for quality control of comparative genomic hybridization.
Karhu R; Rummukainen J; Lörch T; Isola J
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1999 Feb; 24(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 9885977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Tsubosa Y; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Kamitani S; Peng DF; Ling ZQ; Tani T; Hattori T
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15796963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative genomic hybridization technique.
El-Rifai WE; Knuutila S
Methods Mol Med; 2001; 50():25-33. PubMed ID: 21318813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the detection of DNA sequence copy number changes in Barrett's adenocarcinoma.
Albrecht B; Hausmann M; Zitzelsberger H; Stein H; Siewert JR; Hopt U; Langer R; Höfler H; Werner M; Walch A
J Pathol; 2004 Jul; 203(3):780-8. PubMed ID: 15221937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors.
Kallioniemi A; Kallioniemi OP; Sudar D; Rutovitz D; Gray JW; Waldman F; Pinkel D
Science; 1992 Oct; 258(5083):818-21. PubMed ID: 1359641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
