These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8297885)

  • 1. Caesarean section--public versus private. Why the differential? A reply to obstetric intervention and the economic imperative.
    Molloy D; Richardson P
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Jan; 101(1):88-90. PubMed ID: 8297885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Obstetric intervention and the economic imperative.
    King JF
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Apr; 100(4):303-4. PubMed ID: 8494828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Obstetric intervention and economic imperative.
    Barik S; Jones MH; Meniru GI
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Jan; 101(1):88. PubMed ID: 8297884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Obstetric intervention and the economic imperative.
    Ramsden G
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Nov; 100(11):1063-4. PubMed ID: 8251461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Going public: do risk and choice explain differences in caesarean birth rates between public and private places of birth in Australia?
    Miller YD; Prosser SJ; Thompson R
    Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):627-35. PubMed ID: 22877762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reforming maternity services in Australia: Outcomes of a private practice midwifery service.
    Wilkes E; Gamble J; Adam G; Creedy DK
    Midwifery; 2015 Oct; 31(10):935-40. PubMed ID: 26092305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Paying for medical care--the New Zealand system.
    Richards JG
    J Fam Pract; 1980 Mar; 10(3):545-7. PubMed ID: 7354301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Should women who elect to have caesarean sections pay for them?
    MacKenzie IZ
    BMJ; 1999 Apr; 318(7190):1070. PubMed ID: 10205112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Is there a need of cost limit in connection with X-ray examination in private practice?].
    Laurin S; Palmquist Y
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Feb; 98(8):864. PubMed ID: 11265574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rising Rates of Caesarean Section in Urban Nepal.
    Dhakal Rai S; Regmi PR; Teijlingen EV; Wood J; Dangal G; Dhakal KB
    J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2019 Jan; 16(41):479-480. PubMed ID: 30739926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in private and public health facilities in underserved South Asian communities: cross-sectional analysis of data from Bangladesh, India and Nepal.
    Neuman M; Alcock G; Azad K; Kuddus A; Osrin D; More NS; Nair N; Tripathy P; Sikorski C; Saville N; Sen A; Colbourn T; Houweling TA; Seward N; Manandhar DS; Shrestha BP; Costello A; Prost A
    BMJ Open; 2014 Dec; 4(12):e005982. PubMed ID: 25550293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What private-practice doctors can do to contain costs. Steps you can take to preserve a free market.
    Orient JM
    Postgrad Med; 1994 Feb; 95(3):32-8. PubMed ID: 8115300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Private medicine in Britain: truth or opinion?
    Wolochow MS
    CMAJ; 1994 Sep; 151(6):736; author reply 737. PubMed ID: 8087749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rates and Predictors of Caesarean Section for First and Second Births: A Prospective Cohort of Australian Women.
    Hure A; Powers J; Chojenta C; Loxton D
    Matern Child Health J; 2017 May; 21(5):1175-1184. PubMed ID: 28102500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Caesarean birth rates in public and privately funded hospitals: a cross-sectional study.
    Alonso BD; Silva FMBD; Latorre MDRDO; Diniz CSG; Bick D
    Rev Saude Publica; 2017; 51():101. PubMed ID: 29166449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Caesarean section--claims and concerns.
    Hugo-Hamman C
    S Afr Med J; 2005 Apr; 95(4):200. PubMed ID: 15889838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of obstetric outcome of a primary-care access clinic staffed by certified nurse-midwives and a private practice group of obstetricians in the same community.
    Blanchette H
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1864-8; discussion 1868-71. PubMed ID: 7778645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analyzing the impact of private service on the cesarean section rate in public hospital Thailand.
    Phadungkiatwattana P; Tongsakul N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Dec; 284(6):1375-9. PubMed ID: 21359844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of factors influencing the rise of cesarean sections rates in Pakistan, using MCDM.
    Ali Y; Khan MW; Mumtaz U; Salman A; Muhammad N; Sabir M
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2018 Oct; 31(8):1058-1069. PubMed ID: 30415618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Secular trends in caesarean section rates over 20 years in a regional obstetric unit in Hong Kong.
    Chung WH; Kong CW; To WW
    Hong Kong Med J; 2017 Aug; 23(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 28684651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.