These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8298312)

  • 1. [Evaluation of tumor extension in invasive cancer of the uterine cervix. Diagnostic evaluation of cervix cancer].
    Genolet PM; Hänggi W; Dreher E
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1993; 33(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 8298312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The status of computerized tomography in the diagnosis of primary cervix cancer].
    Räber G; Pötzschke B
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1989 Jan; 49(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 2917702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Problem of pretherapeutic staging of cervical carcinoma. Studies of the diagnostic value of computerized tomography and magnetic resonance tomography in comparison with gynecologic palpation findings and pathologic-anatomic diagnosis].
    Zapf S; Halbsguth A; Schweden F; Klose K; Lochner B; Beck T; Friese K; Kreienberg R
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1987 Dec; 47(12):838-42. PubMed ID: 3436507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix--3 years' experience].
    Bosković V; Glisić A; Petković S
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1998; 126(5-6):183-7. PubMed ID: 9863378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Value of computed tomography and lymphography in staging carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Marincek B; Devaud MC; Triller J; Fuchs WA
    Eur J Radiol; 1984 May; 4(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 6734609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
    Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Studies on parametrial infiltration of uterine cervical cancer (author's transl)].
    Noguchi H; Shiozawa K; Tsukahara Y; Shiozawa I; Sakai Y; Tsukamoto T; Fukuta T; Iwai S
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1981 Nov; 33(11):1943-50. PubMed ID: 7320594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Diagnostic imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma: MRI, CT, and ultrasonography].
    Michniewicz K; Oellinger J
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2001 Apr; 123(4):222-8. PubMed ID: 11370531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Postoperative outcomes of MR-invisible stage IB1 cervical cancer.
    Park JY; Lee JW; Park BK; Lee YY; Choi CH; Kim TJ; Bae DS; Kim BG; Park JJ; Park SY; Kim CK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 211(2):168.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24607752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 18F-FDG-PET/CT is of limited value in primary staging of early stage cervical cancer.
    Driscoll DO; Halpenny D; Johnston C; Sheehy N; Keogan M
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 25015401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with carcinoma of the cervix (a pilot study).
    Soeters RP; Beningfield SJ; Dehaeck K; Levin W; Bloch B
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1991 Apr; 17(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 2015918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) cervical cancer staging: A review of gaps and questions that remain.
    Salvo G; Odetto D; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Ramirez PT
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jun; 30(6):873-878. PubMed ID: 32241876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of MR imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma.
    Boss EA; Barentsz JO; Massuger LF; Boonstra H
    Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(2):256-70. PubMed ID: 10663755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Risk factors and prognosis of node-positive cervical carcinoma].
    Feng SY; Zhang YN; Liu JG
    Ai Zheng; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1261-6. PubMed ID: 16219145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Results of surgical treatment of stage IIb cervix cancer].
    Friedberg V; Beck T
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1989 Sep; 49(9):782-6. PubMed ID: 2806851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Role of X-ray computed tomography in the staging of cervical carcinoma].
    Kojima Y
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Mar; 41(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 2732565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings.
    Kim SH; Choi BI; Lee HP; Kang SB; Choi YM; Han MC; Kim CW
    Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2315503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A case of isolated massive presacral lymphatic metastasis in stage I uterine cervical cancer].
    Ismail E; Kornovski J; Stoilov S; Ivanov S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2016; 55 Suppl 1 Pt 1():38-42. PubMed ID: 27514169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The potentials of computed axial tomography (CAT) in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the cervix uteri].
    Gochev G; Totsev N; Vasilev D; Simeonova L; Ianev N; Elenchev L
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1994; 33(3):25-6. PubMed ID: 7793520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Lymph node metastasis in microcarcinoma of the uterine cervix].
    Rohde E; Tessmann D
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1993; 115(3):133-5. PubMed ID: 8465626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.