These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8298720)
1. An investigation of the rheological properties of 10 vinyl-polysiloxane impression materials. Chai J; Pang IC; Leong D; Kim JE; Torres P J Prosthodont; 1993 Sep; 2(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 8298720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An investigation of the rheological properties of several interocclusal registration materials. Chai J; Leong DK; Pang IC J Prosthodont; 1994 Sep; 3(3):134-7. PubMed ID: 7874254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Temperature effects on the rheological properties of current polyether and polysiloxane impression materials during setting. Berg JC; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Adán-Plaza S J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 12886208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of a shear load on the viscosities of 10 vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. Pang IC; Chai J J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Aug; 72(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 7932265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An evaluation of selected vinyl polysiloxane and vinyl polysiloxane-hybrid elastomeric impression materials. Megremis S; Tiba A; Vogt K; Geary R; Kuehne J J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):405-6. PubMed ID: 22467705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of temperature on the dimensional stability of poly (vinyl siloxane) impression materials. Chew CL; Chee WW; Donovan TE Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 8148022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flow profile of regular and fast-setting elastomeric impression materials using a shark fin testing device. Lawson NC; Cakir D; Ramp L; Burgess JO J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 21649832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of the setting stage on the accuracy of double-mix impressions made with addition-curing silicone. Takahashi H; Finger WJ J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Jul; 72(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 8083842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The study on surface porosity of die stone. Influence of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials]. Okuda N; Ueno S; Kawada E; Nakanishi K; Sumii T Shikwa Gakuho; 1990 Feb; 90(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 2135095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Applicable research in practice: understanding the hydrophilic and flow property measurements of impression materials. Perry RD; Goldberg JA; Benchimol J; Orfanidis J Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2006 Oct; 27(10):582-6. PubMed ID: 17120392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist, and wet conditions. Petrie CS; Walker MP; O'mahony AM; Spencer P J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 14564291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of preference of mixing techniques and duration of mixing and tray loading for two viscosities of vinyl polysiloxane material. Nam J; Raigrodski AJ; Townsend J; Lepe X; Mancl LA J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jan; 97(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 17280886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A modified putty-wash vinyl polysiloxane impression technique for fixed prosthodontics. Chaimattayompol N; Park D J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Dec; 98(6):483-5. PubMed ID: 18061743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing optical 3D scanning of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. DeLong R; Pintado MR; Ko CC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH J Prosthodont; 2001 Jun; 10(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 11512112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of glow-discharge and surfactant treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. Erkut S; Can G J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 15798686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Some parameters for testing deformation of elastomeric impression materials. Blomberg PA; Mahmood S; Smales RJ; Makinson OF Aust Dent J; 1992 Aug; 37(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 1444946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of surface treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. Kess RS; Combe EC; Sparks BS J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 10898846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping. Linkevicius T; Svediene O; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs. Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]