These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8298720)

  • 21. Hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Sadan A
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 17(5):310. PubMed ID: 16121746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of surface moisture on detail reproduction of elastomeric impressions.
    Johnson GH; Lepe X; Aw TC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):354-64. PubMed ID: 14564290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under different conditions.
    Katyayan PA; Kalavathy N; Katyayan M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):881-2. PubMed ID: 22484900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bond strengths between elastomeric impression materials and disinfected preliminary impressions.
    DeWald JP; Nakajima H; Bell LJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Apr; 71(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 8196006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dentin surface reproduction with hydrophilic and hydrophobic impression materials.
    Takahashi H; Finger WJ
    Dent Mater; 1991 Jul; 7(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 1813343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A study of the "thixotropic" property of elastomeric impression materials.
    Chai J; Pang IC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 8003196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of elastomeric impression materials' thixotropic behavior.
    Tolidis K; Tortopidis D; Gerasimou P; Theocharidou A; Boutsiouki C
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2013 Jun; 21(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 23888530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Working times of elastomeric impression materials determined by dimensional accuracy.
    Tan E; Chai J; Wozniak WT
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 8639243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of mixing technique on surface characteristics of impression materials.
    Lepe X; Johnson GH; Berg JC; Aw TC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 9597600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials: dimensional accuracy, wettability, and effect on gypsum hardness.
    Panichuttra R; Jones RM; Goodacre C; Munoz CA; Moore BK
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 1810315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Compression resistance of four interocclusal recording materials.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Dec; 68(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 1494111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components.
    Hondrum SO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: a review of properties and techniques.
    Chee WW; Donovan TE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):728-32. PubMed ID: 1432791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the elastic recovery of polyether impression materials.
    Endo T; Finger WJ
    Am J Dent; 2005 Dec; 18(6):355-60. PubMed ID: 16433407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Surface detail reproduction of elastomeric impression materials related to rheological properties.
    German MJ; Carrick TE; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):951-6. PubMed ID: 18164051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies.
    Price RB; Gerrow JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 10709039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Setting characteristics of vinyl-polysiloxane interocclusal recording materials.
    Hatzi P; Tzakis M; Eliades G
    Dent Mater; 2012 Jul; 28(7):783-91. PubMed ID: 22572539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Distortion of impression materials used in the double-mix technique.
    Petersen GF; Asmussen E
    Scand J Dent Res; 1991 Aug; 99(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 1771382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Static and dynamic evaluations of the wettability of commercial vinyl polysiloxane impression materials for artificial saliva.
    Luo F; Hong G; Wang T; Jia L; Chen JY; Suo L; Pei XB; Wan QB
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Sep; 37(5):818-824. PubMed ID: 29962413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.