151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8298869)
1. The indeterminate breast mass: assessment using contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Hickman PF; Moore NR; Shepstone BJ
Br J Radiol; 1994 Jan; 67(793):14-20. PubMed ID: 8298869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging.
Low RN; Sigeti JS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1131-40. PubMed ID: 7976889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and fat suppressed magnetic resonance imaging in suspected recurrent carcinoma of the breast: preliminary experience.
Kerslake RW; Fox JN; Carleton PJ; Imrie MJ; Cook AM; Bowsley SJ; Horsman A
Br J Radiol; 1994 Dec; 67(804):1158-68. PubMed ID: 7874413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast neoplasms: T2* susceptibility-contrast, first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
Kuhl CK; Bieling H; Gieseke J; Ebel T; Mielcarek P; Far F; Folkers P; Elevelt A; Schild HH
Radiology; 1997 Jan; 202(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 8988196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast combined with pharmacokinetic analysis of gadolinium-DTPA uptake in the diagnosis of local recurrence of early stage breast carcinoma.
Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Bowsley SJ; Carleton PJ; Fox JN; Turnbull LW; Horsman A
Invest Radiol; 1995 Nov; 30(11):650-62. PubMed ID: 8557506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [A pharmacokinetic analysis of Gd-DTPA enhancement in MRT in breast carcinoma].
Hess T; Knopp MV; Hoffmann U; Brix G; Junkermann H; Zuna I; von Fournier D; van Kaick G
Rofo; 1994 Jun; 160(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 8011997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations.
Kaiser WA; Zeitler E
Radiology; 1989 Mar; 170(3 Pt 1):681-6. PubMed ID: 2916021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features.
Stomper PC; Herman S; Klippenstein DL; Winston JS; Edge SB; Arredondo MA; Mazurchuk RV; Blumenson LE
Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 7480682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR imaging of the breast after surgery for breast cancer.
Whitehouse GH; Moore NR
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):591-603. PubMed ID: 7489311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic magnetic resonance mammography of both breasts following local excision and radiotherapy for breast carcinoma.
Murray AD; Redpath TW; Needham G; Gilbert FJ; Brookes JA; Eremin O
Br J Radiol; 1996 Jul; 69(823):594-600. PubMed ID: 8696694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pelvic lesions in patients with treated cervical carcinoma: efficacy of pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR images in distinguishing recurrent tumors from benign conditions.
Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Schaeffer U; Knopp MV; Brix G; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Essig M; van Kaick G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):401-8. PubMed ID: 8553955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique.
Boetes C; Barentsz JO; Mus RD; van der Sluis RF; van Erning LJ; Hendriks JH; Holland R; Ruys SH
Radiology; 1994 Dec; 193(3):777-81. PubMed ID: 7972823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Quantitative dynamic contrast breast-MRI with the 0.5 tesla equipment].
Klengel S; Hietschold V; Schreiber M; Köhler K
Rontgenpraxis; 1994 Aug; 47(8):223-8. PubMed ID: 7974011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [The MRT of the breast with 2D-spin-echo and gradient-echo sequences in diagnostically problematic cases].
Allgayer B; Lukas P; Loos W; Kersting-Sommerhoff B
Rofo; 1993 May; 158(5):423-7. PubMed ID: 8490150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast combined with analysis of contrast agent kinetics in the differentiation of primary breast tumours.
Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Drew PJ; Fox JN; Carleton PJ; Turnbull LW; Horsman A
Clin Radiol; 1997 Jul; 52(7):516-26. PubMed ID: 9240704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic MR mammography: a technique for potentially reducing the biopsy rate for benign breast disease.
Turkat TJ; Klein BD; Polan RL; Richman RH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(4):563-8. PubMed ID: 7949682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast.
Nunes LW; Schnall MD; Siegelman ES; Langlotz CP; Orel SG; Sullivan D; Muenz LA; Reynolds CA; Torosian MH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Aug; 169(2):409-15. PubMed ID: 9242744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles.
Stack JP; Redmond OM; Codd MB; Dervan PA; Ennis JT
Radiology; 1990 Feb; 174(2):491-4. PubMed ID: 2296657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance imaging in potential postsurgical recurrence of breast cancer: pitfalls and limitations.
Cohen EK; Leonhardt CM; Shumak RS; Soutar IC; Bukhanov K; Fishell EK; Plewes DB
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1996 Jun; 47(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 8640412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
