These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8299814)
1. [Comparison of the cleansing effect of two micromotor-driven endodontic hand pieces. I. Comparison ot the cleansing effect of the two handpieces]. Bartha K; Rocca JP Fogorv Sz; 1993 Nov; 86(11):365-72. PubMed ID: 8299814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Cleansing effect of two micromotor-driven endodontic handpieces.II. Effect of various rinsing solutions on the cleansing effect of the handpieces]. Bartha K; Rocca JP Fogorv Sz; 1993 Dec; 86(12):401-6. PubMed ID: 8307227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two endodontic handpieces during the preparation of root canals in extracted human teeth. Smith RB; Edmunds DH Int Endod J; 1998 Jan; 31(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 9823125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation. Hülsmann M; Rümmelin C; Schäfers F J Endod; 1997 May; 23(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 9545932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vitro comparison of the Excalibur handpiece and hand instrumentation in curved root canals. Cheung GS; Chan AW J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 8618094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electric handpieces: predictable power for efficient preparation. Freedman G Dent Today; 2007 Apr; 26(4):144, 146-9. PubMed ID: 17486792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals. Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation. Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study. Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Schäfer E; Vlassis M Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of débridement techniques for endodontic instruments. Segall RO; del Rio CE; Brady JM; Ayer WA Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1977 Nov; 44(5):786-91. PubMed ID: 270074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of root canal preparation using different automated devices and hand instrumentation. Hülsmann M; Stryga F J Endod; 1993 Mar; 19(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 8509753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study. Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of the planimetric and gravimetric methods in the study of the efficiency of endodontic instruments]. Bartha K; Dobó NC; Bernáth M; Kapolka J; Szabó J Fogorv Sz; 1995 Apr; 88(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 8522006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevalence and management of instrument fracture in the postgraduate endodontic program at the Dental School of Athens: a five-year retrospective clinical study. Tzanetakis GN; Kontakiotis EG; Maurikou DV; Marzelou MP J Endod; 2008 Jun; 34(6):675-8. PubMed ID: 18498887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of root canal preparation with two automated endodontic handpieces. O'Connell DT; Brayton SM Oral Health; 1975 Dec; 65(12):18-20. PubMed ID: 1074129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of Er:YAG laser irradiation in removing debris and smear layer on root canal walls. Takeda FH; Harashima T; Kimura Y; Matsumoto K J Endod; 1998 Aug; 24(8):548-51. PubMed ID: 9759018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ex vivo study of the efficacy of H-files and rotary Ni-Ti instruments to remove gutta-percha and four types of sealer. Kosti E; Lambrianidis T; Economides N; Neofitou C Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 16409328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]