These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8299829)

  • 1. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system.
    McDonnell D; Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 8299829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems.
    Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 9927091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films.
    Sanderink GC; Huiskens R; van der Stelt PF; Welander US; Stheeman SE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 8078654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sens-A-Ray. A new system for direct digital intraoral radiography.
    Nelvig P; Wing K; Welander U
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Dec; 74(6):818-23. PubMed ID: 1488241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitometric response of the Sens-A-Ray, a charge-coupled imaging device, to changes in beam energy.
    Goshima T; Goshima Y; Scarfe WC; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan; 25(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 9084280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the new RadioVisioGraphy system image quality.
    Benz C; Mouyen F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Nov; 72(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 1745524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A laboratory evaluation of Ektaspeed Plus dental X-ray film.
    Horner K; Rushton VE; Shearer AC
    J Dent; 1995 Dec; 23(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 8530727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychophysical properties of a new F-speed intraoral film.
    Mastoris M; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Tsiklakis K; Papadakis E; Li G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 15371315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical study of the sensitivity and dynamic range of three digital systems, E-speed film and digitized film.
    Bóscolo FN; Oliveira AE; Almeida SM; Haiter CF; Haiter Neto F
    Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 11696917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of the sensitometric properties of screen-film systems and conventional dental receptors for intraoral radiography.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 2594331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test.
    Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Okamura K; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 15314001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computed dental radiography: evaluation of a new charge-coupled device-based intraoral radiographic system.
    Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Schick DB; Rumack PM
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Jun; 26(6):399-404. PubMed ID: 8602420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraoral computed radiography using the Fuji computed radiography imaging plate. Correlation between image quality and reading condition.
    Kashima I; Sakurai T; Matsuki T; Nakamura K; Aoki H; Ishii M; Kanagawa Y
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Aug; 78(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 7936596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of thin K-edge filters on the image quality of D- and E-speed dental film.
    MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP; Payne M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 8593903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitometric comparison of direct- and indirect-exposure films used in intraoral radiography.
    Hashimoto K; Thunthy KH; Iwai K; Ejima K; Weinberg R
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1992 Jun; 34(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 1500950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A laboratory comparison of three imaging systems for image quality and radiation exposure characteristics.
    Bhaskaran V; Qualtrough AJ; Rushton VE; Worthington HV; Horner K
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 16104978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro comparison of 10 radiographic methods for working length estimation.
    Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K; Czajka J
    Int Endod J; 1995 May; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 8626199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imaging: new versus traditional technological aids.
    Sanderink GC
    Int Dent J; 1993 Aug; 43(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 8276517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.