92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8299830)
1. Exposure reduction in cephalography with a digital photostimulable phosphor imaging system.
Seki K; Okano T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):127-30. PubMed ID: 8299830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of low-dose digital lateral cephalometric radiographs.
Näslund EB; Kruger M; Petersson A; Hansen K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 9693525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Possibilities of dose reduction in lateral cephalometric radiographs and its effects on clinical diagnostics.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17329587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system.
Chen YJ; Chen SK; Huang HW; Yao CC; Chang HF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 15585806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of image quality on the identification of cephalometric landmarks.
McWilliam JS; Welander U
Angle Orthod; 1978 Jan; 48(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 272131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computed radiography: photostimulable phosphor image plate technology.
Long BW
Radiol Technol; 1989; 61(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 2587727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy, and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique.
Geelen W; Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E; Kruger M; Hansson LG
Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 9699411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phosphor-stimulated computed cephalometry: reliability of landmark identification.
Lim KF; Foong KW
Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 9459029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms.
Hagemann K; Vollmer D; Niegel T; Ehmer U; Reuter I
J Orofac Orthop; 2000; 61(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 10783561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cephalometric analysis with digital storage phosphor images: extreme low-exposure images with and without postprocessing noise reduction.
Näslund EB; Møystad A; Larheim TA; Øgaard B; Kruger M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Aug; 124(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 12923516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Profile enhancement and cephalometric landmark identification.
Burger HJ; Rossouw PE; Stander I
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Mar; 105(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 8135208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cephalometric digitization: A determination of the minimum scanner settings necessary for precise landmark identification.
Held CL; Ferguson DJ; Gallo MW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):472-81. PubMed ID: 11343018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital imaging with a photostimulable phosphor in the chest of newborns.
Cohen MD; Katz BP; Kalasinski LA; White SJ; Smith JA; Long B
Radiology; 1991 Dec; 181(3):829-32. PubMed ID: 1947105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Digital cephalometric teleradiography with storage phosphors. Comparative study].
Nessi R; Garattini G; Blanc M; Marzano L; Pignanelli C; Uslenghi C
Radiol Med; 1993 Apr; 85(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 8516464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic yield of conventional and digital cephalometric images: a human cadaver study.
Gijbels F; Bou Serhal C; Willems G; Bosmans H; Sanderink G; Persoons M; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 11313730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pediatric musculoskeletal computed radiography.
Kottamasu SR; Kuhns LR; Stringer DA
Pediatr Radiol; 1997 Jul; 27(7):563-75. PubMed ID: 9211947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging characteristics of new screen/film systems for cephalometric radiography.
Fatouros PP; Gibbs SJ; Skubic SE; Rao GU
Angle Orthod; 1984 Jan; 54(1):36-54. PubMed ID: 6584050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
