These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8299831)

  • 1. Perception of image quality in direct digital radiography after application of various image treatment filters for detectability of dental disease.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 8299831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Goga R; Chandler NP; Love RM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15314002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs.
    Yalcinkaya S; Künzel A; Willers R; Thoms M; Becker J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 16632278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Ohki M; Okano T; Nakamura T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 7835507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The quality of the X-ray image: fault analysis.
    Brocklebank LM
    Dent Update; 1998 Jun; 25(5):188-90, 192-4. PubMed ID: 18170953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E; Attaelmanan A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 10808218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sens-A-Ray. A new system for direct digital intraoral radiography.
    Nelvig P; Wing K; Welander U
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Dec; 74(6):818-23. PubMed ID: 1488241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of complementary metal oxide semiconductor and charge-coupled device intraoral X-ray detectors using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 15070845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sliding window adaptive histogram equalization of intraoral radiographs: effect on image quality.
    Sund T; Møystad A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 16618843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions. II. Effects on diagnostic accuracy after application of image processing.
    Kullendorff B; Nilsson M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Nov; 82(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 8936525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial resolution requirements for digitizing dental radiographs.
    Kassebaum DK; McDavid WD; Dove SB; Waggener RG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Jun; 67(6):760-9. PubMed ID: 2740097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct digital radiography in the dental office.
    Wenzel A; Gröndahl HG
    Int Dent J; 1995 Feb; 45(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 7607741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digitally Scanned Radiographs versus Conventional Films for Determining Clarity of Periapical Lesions and Quality of Root Canal Treatment.
    Almanei K; Alsulaimani R; Alfadda S; Albabtain S; Alsulaimani R
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2017; 2017():2427060. PubMed ID: 29270461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Current practice in conventional and digital intraoral radiography: problems and solutions.
    Fuhrmann AW
    Int J Comput Dent; 2006 Jan; 9(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 16608054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-aided image manipulation of intraoral radiographs to enhance diagnosis in dental practice: a review.
    Wenzel A
    Int Dent J; 1993 Apr; 43(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 8320010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital radiographic images will benefit endodontic services.
    Lavelle CL; Wu CJ
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1995 Dec; 11(6):253-60. PubMed ID: 8617158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detectability of artificial periapical lesions using direct digital and conventional radiography.
    Barbat J; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1998 Dec; 24(12):837-42. PubMed ID: 10023266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpretation of periapical lesions using RadioVisioGraphy.
    Yokota ET; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE
    J Endod; 1994 Oct; 20(10):490-4. PubMed ID: 7714421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality aspects of digital radiography in general dental practice.
    Hellén-Halme K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2007; (184):9-60. PubMed ID: 17645148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The diagnosis of bone lesions with conventional x-ray images and with a direct digital procedure (RVG). An in-vitro study. RadioVisioGraphy].
    Stassinakis A; Zeyer O; Brägger U
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1995; 105(12):1539-45. PubMed ID: 8553039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.