These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8300258)

  • 21. In vitro comparison of root-canal measurements with conventional and digital radiology.
    Lozano A; Forner L; Llena C
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):542-50. PubMed ID: 12190912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of a digital measurement tool to estimate working length in endodontics.
    Lamus F; Katz JO; Glaros AG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2001 Feb; 2(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 12167941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals.
    Burger CL; Mork TO; Hutter JW; Nicoll B
    J Endod; 1999 Apr; 25(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 10425952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of digital dental X-ray systems with self-developing film and manual processing for endodontic file length determination.
    Eikenberg S; Vandre R
    J Endod; 2000 Feb; 26(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 11194373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of the canal contents on the electrical assisted determination of the length of root canals.
    Pommer O; Stamm O; Attin T
    J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):83-5. PubMed ID: 11833694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Endodontic therapy in a 3-rooted mandibular first molar: importance of a thorough radiographic examination.
    Segura-Egea JJ; Jiménez-Pinzón A; Ríos-Santos JV
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 68(9):541-4. PubMed ID: 12366884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Linear measurements to determine working length of curved canals with fine files: conventional versus digital radiography.
    Brito-Júnior M; Santos LA; Baleeiro EN; Pêgo MM; Eleutério NB; Camilo CC
    J Oral Sci; 2009 Dec; 51(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 20032608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interpretation of endodontic file lengths using RadioVisiography.
    Leddy BJ; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE
    J Endod; 1994 Nov; 20(11):542-5. PubMed ID: 7643038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in-vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
    Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
    Int Endod J; 1991 Sep; 24(5):233-9. PubMed ID: 1813427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The ability of root ZX apex locator to reduce the frequency of overestimated radiographic working length.
    ElAyouti A; Weiger R; Löst C
    J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 11833683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An in vivo comparative evaluation to determine the accuracy of working length between radiographic and electronic apex locators.
    Singh SV; Nikhil V; Singh AV; Yadav S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):359-62. PubMed ID: 23059573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dose reduction of two digital sensor systems measuring file lengths.
    Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 May; 81(5):607-12. PubMed ID: 8734712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radiographic versus electronic root canal working length determination.
    Kqiku L; Städtler P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):777-80. PubMed ID: 22484869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of D-, E-, and F-speed conventional intraoral radiographic films in endodontic measurement.
    Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Mar; 93(3):337-40. PubMed ID: 11925545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Working length in root canal fillings.
    Pagan JC; Santa CA; Alvarez JA
    N Y State Dent J; 1993 Nov; 59(9):41-3. PubMed ID: 8247456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison between conventional and digital radiography in root canal working length determination.
    Farida A; Maryam E; Ali M; Ehsan M; Sajad Y; Soraya K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 23965452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The evaluation of the ability of Apex D.S.P. to determine the length of root canal. In vitro study].
    Lewińska E; Lipski M; Marciniak-Paradowska M; Woźniak K; Lichota D
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 19374229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of radiographic and electronical working length determination on palatal and mesio-buccal root canals of extracted upper molars.
    Krajczár K; Marada G; Gyulai G; Tóth V
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Aug; 106(2):e90-3. PubMed ID: 18554958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of three imaging techniques for assessing endodontic working length.
    Griffiths BM; Brown JE; Hyatt AT; Linney AD
    Int Endod J; 1992 Nov; 25(6):279-87. PubMed ID: 1306859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Changes in Root Canal Length Determined during Mechanical Preparation Stages and Their Relationship with the Accuracy of Root ZX II.
    Vasconcelos BC; Bastos LM; Oliveira AS; Bernardes RA; Duarte MA; Vivacqua-Gomes N; Vivan RR
    J Endod; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1683-1686. PubMed ID: 27616540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.