These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8300324)

  • 1. A comparison of glass-ionomer cement and calcium hydroxide liners in amalgam restorations.
    Rabchinsky J; Donly KJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Aug; 13(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 8300324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of a copal varnish, ZOE or glass ionomer cement bases on microleakage of amalgam restorations.
    Manders CA; Garcia-Godoy F; Barnwell GM
    Am J Dent; 1990 Apr; 3(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 2076225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage under amalgam restorations lined with Copalite, Amalgambond Plus, and Vitrebond.
    Newman JE; Hondrum SO; Clem DB
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(4):340-4. PubMed ID: 8957830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Artificial recurrent caries in glass ionomer-lined amalgam restorations.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Jesen ME
    Am J Dent; 1990 Jun; 3(3):89-93. PubMed ID: 2076235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentin adhesive superior to copal varnish in preventing microleakage in primary teeth.
    Royse MC; Ott NW; Mathieu GP
    Pediatr Dent; 1996; 18(7):440-3. PubMed ID: 8970205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Artificial root caries in amalgam restorations: effect of light-cured fluoride releasing liners.
    Jensen ME; Garcia-Godoy F; Wefel JS
    Am J Dent; 1990 Dec; 3(6):295-8. PubMed ID: 2095808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early in vitro marginal microleakage associated with different lining materials under Class II amalgam restorations.
    Youngson CC; Holguin SM
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Dec; 1(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 1306739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal leakage of amalgam restorations pretreated with various liners.
    Tjan AH; Tan DE; Sun JC; Tjan AH
    Am J Dent; 1997 Dec; 10(6):284-6. PubMed ID: 9590917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Class II composite resin restorations using glass-ionomer liners: microleakage studies.
    Aboushala A; Kugel G; Hurley E
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 21(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 9161210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vitro caries inhibition of photopolymerized glass ionomer liners.
    Donly KJ; Ingram C
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(2):128-30. PubMed ID: 9189003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage in restorations with glass ionomer liners after thermocycling.
    Arcoria CJ; Vitasek BA; DeWald JP; Wagner MJ
    J Dent; 1990 Apr; 18(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 2347987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Posterior composite Class II restorations: in vitro comparison of preparation designs and restoration techniques.
    Donly KJ; Wild TW; Jensen ME
    Dent Mater; 1990 Apr; 6(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 2079176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners.
    Leevailoj C; Cochran MA; Matis BA; Moore BK; Platt JA
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 11357574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage in alloy-glass ionomer lined amalgam restorations after thermocycling.
    Arcoria CJ; Fisher MA; Wagner MJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Jan; 18(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 2051252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.