These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8300949)

  • 1. Speaker-independent consonant classification in continuous speech with distinctive features and neural networks.
    De Mori R; Flammia G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3091-103. PubMed ID: 8300949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic-phonetic features for the automatic classification of fricatives.
    Ali AM; Van der Spiegel J; Mueller P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2217-35. PubMed ID: 11386573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic and speaker variation in Dutch /n/ and /m/ as a function of phonetic context and syllabic position.
    Smorenburg L; Heeren W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Aug; 150(2):979. PubMed ID: 34470278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Classification of stop place in consonant-vowel contexts using feature extrapolation of acoustic-phonetic features in telephone speech.
    Lee JW; Choi JY; Kang HG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1536-46. PubMed ID: 22352523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some effects of acoustic attributes of speech on the processing of phonetic feature information.
    Soli SD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Nov; 6(4):622-38. PubMed ID: 6449534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inferring articulation and recognizing gestures from acoustics with a neural network trained on x-ray microbeam data.
    Papcun G; Hochberg J; Thomas TR; Laroche F; Zacks J; Levy S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Aug; 92(2 Pt 1):688-700. PubMed ID: 1506525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structural design of hidden Markov model speech recognizer using multivalued phonetic features: comparison with segmental speech units.
    Deng L; Erler K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Dec; 92(6):3058-67. PubMed ID: 1474221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved speech inversion using general regression neural network.
    Najnin S; Banerjee B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):EL229-35. PubMed ID: 26428818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A neural network model of the articulatory-acoustic forward mapping trained on recordings of articulatory parameters.
    Kello CT; Plaut DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2354-64. PubMed ID: 15532666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phoneme discrimination using connectionist networks.
    Watrous RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1753-72. PubMed ID: 2341680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Emotional speech acoustic model for Malay: iterative versus isolated unit training.
    Mustafa MB; Ainon RN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3057-66. PubMed ID: 24116440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic hole filling for sparse enrollment data using a cohort universal corpus for speaker recognition.
    Suh JW; Hansen JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1515-28. PubMed ID: 22352521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preliminary results on speaker-dependent variation in the TIMIT database.
    Byrd D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jul; 92(1):593-6. PubMed ID: 1512325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do long-term acoustic-phonetic features and mel-frequency cepstral coefficients provide complementary speaker-specific information for forensic voice comparison?
    Chan RKW; Wang BX
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Oct; 363():112199. PubMed ID: 39182457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tone recognition of continuous Mandarin speech assisted with prosodic information.
    Wang YR; Chen SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Nov; 96(5 Pt 1):2637-45. PubMed ID: 7983269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech production knowledge in automatic speech recognition.
    King S; Frankel J; Livescu K; McDermott E; Richmond K; Wester M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Feb; 121(2):723-42. PubMed ID: 17348495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of acoustic parameters for consonant voicing classification in clean and telephone speech.
    Lee SM; Choi JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):EL197-202. PubMed ID: 22423808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gender recognition from speech. Part II: Fine analysis.
    Childers DG; Wu K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1841-56. PubMed ID: 1755877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features.
    Stevens KN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1872-91. PubMed ID: 12002871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.