These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8300951)

  • 1. Auditory filter shapes of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners in continuous broadband noise.
    Leek MR; Summers V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3127-37. PubMed ID: 8300951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; Delhorne LA
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Mar; 16(1):19-39. PubMed ID: 22593204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal, and elderly listeners.
    Sommers MS; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 May; 93(5):2903-14. PubMed ID: 8315154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory filter nonlinearity in mild/moderate hearing impairment.
    Baker RJ; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1330-9. PubMed ID: 11931310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intensity perception. XIV. Intensity discrimination in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Florentine M; Reed CM; Rabinowitz WM; Braida LD; Durlach NI; Buus S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2575-86. PubMed ID: 8270735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory filter asymmetry in the hearing impaired.
    Tyler RS; Hall JW; Glasberg BR; Moore BC; Patterson RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Nov; 76(5):1363-8. PubMed ID: 6512098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory filter shapes at low center frequencies in young and elderly hearing-impaired subjects.
    Peters RW; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):256-66. PubMed ID: 1737876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Masker phase effects in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: evidence for peripheral compression at low signal frequencies.
    Oxenham AJ; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2248-57. PubMed ID: 15532656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduced frequency selectivity and the preservation of spectral contrast in noise.
    Leek MR; Summers V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Sep; 100(3):1796-806. PubMed ID: 8817905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterizing auditory processing and perception in individual listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jepsen ML; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):262-81. PubMed ID: 21303008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Cochlear Damage on the Sensitivity to Harmonicity.
    Bonnard D; Dauman R; Semal C; Demany L
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 27992390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Limited resolution of spectral contrast and hearing loss for speech in noise.
    ter Keurs M; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Sep; 94(3 Pt 1):1307-14. PubMed ID: 8408972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gap detection as a function of stimulus loudness for listeners with and without hearing loss.
    Nelson PB; Thomas SD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1387-94. PubMed ID: 9430758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Altered attentional filters in subjects with graded levels of sensorineural hearing loss.
    Bester CW; Robertson D; Taljaard D; Hammond G
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():80-87. PubMed ID: 28610719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal modulation transfer functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; Delhorne LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3884-96. PubMed ID: 21682411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monaural envelope correlation perception in listeners with normal hearing and cochlear impairment.
    Hall JW; Grose JH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 36(6):1306-14. PubMed ID: 8114497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bacon SP; Viemeister NF
    Audiology; 1985; 24(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 3994589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The probe-signal method and auditory-filter shape: results from normal- and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Moore BC; Hafter ER; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jan; 99(1):542-52. PubMed ID: 8568042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relations among some psychoacoustic parameters in normal and cochlearly impaired listeners.
    Ludvigsen C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Oct; 78(4):1271-80. PubMed ID: 4056221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modulation Detection Interference (MDI) in listeners with cochlear hearing loss.
    Grose JH; Hall JW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 37(3):680-6. PubMed ID: 8084198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.