These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8300956)

  • 1. The envelope following response (EFR) in the Mongolian gerbil to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated signals in the presence of simultaneously gated pure tones.
    Dolphin WF; Mountain DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3215-26. PubMed ID: 8300956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the envelope following response in the Mongolian gerbil using two-tone and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones.
    Dolphin WF; Chertoff ME; Burkard R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2225-34. PubMed ID: 7963035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The envelope following response: scalp potentials elicited in the Mongolian gerbil using sinusoidally AM acoustic signals.
    Dolphin WF; Mountain DC
    Hear Res; 1992 Feb; 58(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 1559908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The envelope following response to multiple tone pair stimuli.
    Dolphin WF
    Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 110(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 9282884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comments on "The envelope following response (EFR) in the Mongolian gerbil to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated signals in the presence of simultaneously gated pure tones" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94, 3215-3226 (1993)].
    Bernstein LR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):1189-90. PubMed ID: 7930062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-frequency neurons in the inferior colliculus that are sensitive to interaural delays of amplitude-modulated tones: evidence for dual binaural influences.
    Batra R; Kuwada S; Stanford TR
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Jul; 70(1):64-80. PubMed ID: 8395589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus.
    Krishna BS; Semple MN
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Jul; 84(1):255-73. PubMed ID: 10899201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human Envelope Following Responses to Amplitude Modulation: Effects of Aging and Modulation Depth.
    Dimitrijevic A; Alsamri J; John MS; Purcell D; George S; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):e322-35. PubMed ID: 27556365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the existence in human auditory pathways of channels selectively tuned to the modulation present in frequency-modulated tones.
    Kay RH; Matthews DR
    J Physiol; 1972 Sep; 225(3):657-77. PubMed ID: 5076392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity of envelope following responses to vowel polarity.
    Easwar V; Beamish L; Aiken S; Choi JM; Scollie S; Purcell D
    Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 320():38-50. PubMed ID: 25500177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans studied with amplitude-modulated tones.
    Maison S; Micheyl C; Collet L
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Apr; 77(4):1759-68. PubMed ID: 9114234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electro-cochlear potentials elicited by sinusoidally modulated signals.
    Verweij C; Rodenburg M
    Audiology; 1977; 16(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 880128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Processing of sinusoidally amplitude modulated signals in the nuclei of the lateral lemniscus of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.
    Huffman RF; Argeles PC; Covey E
    Hear Res; 1998 Dec; 126(1-2):181-200. PubMed ID: 9872145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Envelope-following response and modulation transfer function in the dolphin's auditory system.
    Supin AY; Popov VV
    Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):38-46. PubMed ID: 8647744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural representations of sinusoidal amplitude and frequency modulations in the primary auditory cortex of awake primates.
    Liang L; Lu T; Wang X
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 May; 87(5):2237-61. PubMed ID: 11976364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Offset tuning curves generated by simultaneous masking are more finely tuned than those generated by forward masking.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1986; 24(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 3771377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimizing the stimuli to evoke the amplitude modulation following response (AMFR) in neonates.
    Riquelme R; Kuwada S; Filipovic B; Hartung K; Leonard G
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):104-19. PubMed ID: 16518139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to SAM tones located in inhibitory response areas.
    Li H; Sabes JH; Sinex DG
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):116-25. PubMed ID: 16945495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Steady-state evoked responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated sounds recorded in man.
    Rees A; Green GG; Kay RH
    Hear Res; 1986; 23(2):123-33. PubMed ID: 3745015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.