These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8301165)

  • 1. Cephalometric measures as indicators of facial attractiveness.
    Tulloch C; Phillips C; Dann C
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 8301165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
    Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rating of facial attractiveness.
    Phillips C; Tulloch C; Dann C
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1992 Aug; 20(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 1526107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation Between Cephalometric Measures and End-of-Treatment Facial Attractiveness.
    Yu XN; Bai D; Feng X; Liu YH; Chen WJ; Li S; Han GL; Jiang RP; Xu TM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):405-9. PubMed ID: 26872281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expectations of treatment and satisfaction with dentofacial appearance in orthodontic patients.
    Bos A; Hoogstraten J; Prahl-Andersen B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 12594417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contribution of malocclusion and female facial attractiveness to smile esthetics evaluated by eye tracking.
    Richards MR; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Walther DB; Rosenstiel S; Sacksteder JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):472-82. PubMed ID: 25836007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perception of facial attractiveness by patients, peers, and professionals.
    Phillips C; Griffin T; Bennett E
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 9081998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Objective assessment of the contribution of dental esthetics and facial attractiveness in men via eye tracking.
    Baker RS; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel SF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):523-533. PubMed ID: 29602344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women.
    Michiels G; Sather AH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 7989819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of computer-aided anteroposterior maxillary incisor movement on ratings of facial attractiveness.
    Schlosser JB; Preston CB; Lampasso J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15643410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The perception of children's computer-imaged facial profiles by patients, mothers and clinicians.
    Miner RM; Anderson NK; Evans CA; Giddon DB
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):1034-9. PubMed ID: 18004912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of orthodontic treatment need: a comparison of study models and facial photographs.
    Sherlock JM; Cobourne MT; McDonald F
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 36(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18205636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facial attractiveness: a longitudinal study.
    Tatarunaite E; Playle R; Hood K; Shaw W; Richmond S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):676-82; quiz 755. PubMed ID: 15953892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles.
    Işiksal E; Hazar S; Akyalçin S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jan; 129(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 16443472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions.
    Todd SA; Hammond P; Hutton T; Cochrane S; Cunningham S
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 15961568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are ratings of dentofacial attractiveness influenced by dentofacial midline discrepancies?
    Shyagali TR; Chandralekha B; Bhayya DP; Kumar S; Balasubramanyam G
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 19113072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facial esthetics in adolescents and its relationship to "ideal" ratios and angles.
    Kiekens RM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; van 't Hof MA; van 't Hof BE; Straatman H; Maltha JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):188.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18249280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.