These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8301433)
1. Clinical evaluation of the macroduct sweat collection system and conductivity analyzer in the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Hammond KB; Turcios NL; Gibson LE J Pediatr; 1994 Feb; 124(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 8301433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between classic Gibson and Cooke technique and sweat conductivity test in patients with and without cystic fibrosis. Mattar AC; Gomes EN; Adde FV; Leone C; Rodrigues JC J Pediatr (Rio J); 2010; 86(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 20148237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Indirect measurements of sweat electrolyte concentration in the laboratory diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Heeley ME; Woolf DA; Heeley AF Arch Dis Child; 2000 May; 82(5):420-4. PubMed ID: 10799439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A reference interval for sweat chloride in infants aged between five and six weeks of age. Jayaraj R; Barton PV; Newland P; Mountford R; Shaw NJ; McCarthy E; Isherwood DM; Southern KW Ann Clin Biochem; 2009 Jan; 46(Pt 1):73-8. PubMed ID: 19103961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis with chloride meter (Sherwood M926S chloride analyzer®) and sweat test analysis system (CFΔ collection system®) compared to the Gibson Cooke method. Emiralioğlu N; Özçelik U; Yalçın E; Doğru D; Kiper N Turk J Pediatr; 2016; 58(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 27922233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skin wipe test: A simple, inexpensive, and fast approach in the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Ďurč P; Foret F; Homola L; Malá M; Pokojová E; Vinohradská H; Dastych M; Krausová D; Nagy D; Bede O; Dřevínek P; Skalická V; Kubáň P Pediatr Pulmonol; 2020 Jul; 55(7):1653-1660. PubMed ID: 32250037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of sweat-testing by the Macroduct collection method combined with conductivity analysis in comparison with the classic Gibson and Cooke technique. Mastella G; Di Cesare G; Borruso A; Menin L; Zanolla L Acta Paediatr; 2000 Aug; 89(8):933-7. PubMed ID: 10976833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The evaluation of a novel conductometric device for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Losty HC; Wheatley H; Doull I Ann Clin Biochem; 2006 Sep; 43(Pt 5):375-81. PubMed ID: 17022880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conductivity determined by a new sweat analyzer compared with chloride concentrations for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Barben J; Ammann RA; Metlagel A; Schoeni MH; J Pediatr; 2005 Feb; 146(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 15689903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the Macroduct collection system reliably define sweat chloride concentration in subjects with intermediate results? Rose JB; Ellis L; John B; Martin S; Gonska T; Solomon M; Tullis E; Corey M; Adeli K; Durie PR Clin Biochem; 2009 Aug; 42(12):1260-4. PubMed ID: 19445912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sweat conductivity and chloride titration for cystic fibrosis diagnosis in 3834 subjects. Lezana JL; Vargas MH; Karam-Bechara J; Aldana RS; Furuya ME J Cyst Fibros; 2003 Mar; 2(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 15463838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of two sweat test systems for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis in newborns. Rueegg CS; Kuehni CE; Gallati S; Jurca M; Jung A; Casaulta C; Barben J; Pediatr Pulmonol; 2019 Mar; 54(3):264-272. PubMed ID: 30609259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sweat conductivity: an accurate diagnostic test for cystic fibrosis? Mattar AC; Leone C; Rodrigues JC; Adde FV J Cyst Fibros; 2014 Sep; 13(5):528-33. PubMed ID: 24485874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of the classical Gibson-Cooke methods and the chloride-sensitive electrode in sweat testing for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis]. Riedler J; Arrer E Padiatr Padol; 1991; 26(4):173-5. PubMed ID: 1749624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sweat conductivity test: can it replace chloride titration for cystic fibrosis diagnosis? Cinel G; Doğru D; Yalçın E; Özçelik U; Gürcan N; Kiper N Turk J Pediatr; 2012; 54(6):576-82. PubMed ID: 23692782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New approach for cystic fibrosis diagnosis based on chloride/potassium ratio analyzed in non-invasively obtained skin-wipe sweat samples by capillary electrophoresis with contactless conductometric detection. Ďurč P; Foret F; Pokojová E; Homola L; Skřičková J; Herout V; Dastych M; Vinohradská H; Kubáň P Anal Bioanal Chem; 2017 May; 409(14):3507-3514. PubMed ID: 28357484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Sweat testing practices in German cystic fibrosis centres]. Naehrlich L Klin Padiatr; 2007; 219(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 17405070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of the Nanoduct sweat test system in the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis after newborn screening. Vernooij-van Langen A; Dompeling E; Yntema JB; Arets B; Tiddens H; Loeber G; Dankert-Roelse J Eur J Pediatr; 2015 Aug; 174(8):1025-34. PubMed ID: 25678232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [French guidelines for sweat test practice and interpretation for cystic fibrosis neonatal screening]. Sermet-Gaudelus I; Munck A; Rota M; Roussey M; Feldmann D; Nguyen-Khoa T; Arch Pediatr; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1349-58. PubMed ID: 20719482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does sweat volume influence the sweat test result? Goldberg S; Schwartz S; Mimouni F; Stankiewicz H; Izbicki G; Picard E Arch Dis Child; 2010 May; 95(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 19966091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]