These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8301894)

  • 1. [Influence of articulatory suppression and memory updating on phonological similarity effect].
    Saito S
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1993 Oct; 64(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 8301894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?
    Larsen JD; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1249-68. PubMed ID: 14578082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phonological similarity effect is abolished by a silent mouthing task.
    Saito S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Apr; 76(2):427-31. PubMed ID: 8483651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What effect can rhythmic finger tapping have on the phonological similarity effect?
    Saito S
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Mar; 22(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 8035694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of visual similarity on short-term memory for spatial location: implications for the capacity of visual short-term memory.
    Walker P; Hitch GJ; Duroe S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1993 Aug; 83(3):203-24. PubMed ID: 8213213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phonological recoding under articulatory suppression.
    Norris D; Butterfield S; Hall J; Page MPA
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Feb; 46(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 28895111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A visuospatial "phonological loop" in working memory: evidence from American Sign Language.
    Wilson M; Emmorey K
    Mem Cognit; 1997 May; 25(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 9184483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is the phonological similarity effect in working memory due to proactive interference?
    Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ; Quinlan PT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1312-1316. PubMed ID: 29648863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Theoretical implications of articulatory duration, phonological similarity, and phonological complexity in verbal working memory.
    Mueller ST; Seymour TL; Kieras DE; Meyer DE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1353-80. PubMed ID: 14622066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of working memory loads on immediate and long-term sentence recall.
    Pham T; Archibald LMD
    Memory; 2023 Jan; 31(1):61-76. PubMed ID: 36107807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Verbal short-term memory as an articulatory system: evidence from an alternative paradigm.
    Cheung H; Wooltorton L
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):195-223. PubMed ID: 11873847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phonological similarity in working memory.
    Copeland DE; Radvansky GA
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Jul; 29(5):774-6. PubMed ID: 11531232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial monitoring in visual working memory.
    Morris N
    Br J Psychol; 1989 Aug; 80 ( Pt 3)():333-49. PubMed ID: 2790392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and phonological similarity: a test of the phonological loop model and the feature model.
    Hanley JR; Bakopoulou E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Jun; 10(2):435-44. PubMed ID: 12921421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Articulatory rehearsal and phonological storage in working memory.
    Longoni AM; Richardson JT; Aiello A
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jan; 21(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 8433641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The phonological store of working memory: is it phonological and is it a store?
    Jones DM; Macken WJ; Nicholls AP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):656-74. PubMed ID: 15099134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall: common effects of phonological loop variables but only limited evidence for the phonological loop.
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1110-41. PubMed ID: 24564540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lexicality and phonological similarity: a challenge for the retrieval-based account of serial recall?
    Fallon AB; Mak E; Tehan G; Daly C
    Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):349-56. PubMed ID: 15948620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.
    Neath I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):403-23. PubMed ID: 11082850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phonological short-term store impairment after cerebellar lesion: a single case study.
    Chiricozzi FR; Clausi S; Molinari M; Leggio MG
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):1940-53. PubMed ID: 18342342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.