These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8301894)

  • 21. The phonological loop model of working memory: an ERP study of irrelevant speech and phonological similarity effects.
    Martín-Loeches M; Schweinberger SR; Sommer W
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Jul; 25(4):471-83. PubMed ID: 9259625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Articulatory suppression and the irrelevant-speech effect in short-term memory: does the locus of suppression matter?
    Toppino TC; Pisegna A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Apr; 12(2):374-9. PubMed ID: 16082821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Retroactive effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall from short-term memory.
    Norris D; Baddeley AD; Page MP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Sep; 30(5):1093-105. PubMed ID: 15355138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Recall of short word lists presented visually at fast rates: effects of phonological similarity and word length.
    Coltheart V; Langdon R
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):330-42. PubMed ID: 9584440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual similarity effects in immediate verbal serial recall.
    Logie RH; Della Sala S; Wynn V; Baddeley AD
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):626-46. PubMed ID: 10994221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The ineluctable modality of the audible: perceptual determinants of auditory verbal short-term memory.
    Maidment DW; Macken WJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):989-97. PubMed ID: 22468724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The articulatory determinants of verbal sequence learning.
    Sjöblom A; Hughes RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1977-1997. PubMed ID: 32700932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Immediate serial recall of words and nonwords: tests of the retrieval-based hypothesis.
    Saint-Aubin J; Poirier M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Jun; 7(2):332-40. PubMed ID: 10909142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reification of phonological storage.
    Macken WJ; Jones DM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1279-88; discussion 1301-6. PubMed ID: 14578084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Visual and phonological components of working memory in children.
    Hitch GJ; Woodin ME; Baker S
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 2927315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Semantic and phonological contributions to short-term repetition and long-term cued sentence recall.
    Meltzer JA; Rose NS; Deschamps T; Leigh RC; Panamsky L; Silberberg A; Madani N; Links KA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):307-29. PubMed ID: 26374330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall.
    Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):838-49. PubMed ID: 14516217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contribution of articulatory rehearsal to short-term memory: evidence from a case of selective disruption.
    Belleville S; Peretz I; Arguin M
    Brain Lang; 1992 Nov; 43(4):713-46. PubMed ID: 1483199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does number data entry rely on the phonological loop?
    Kole JA; Healy AF; Buck-Gengler CJ
    Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):388-94. PubMed ID: 15948625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The phonological similarity effect in immediate recall: positions of shared phonemes.
    Li X; Schweickert R; Gandour J
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1116-25. PubMed ID: 11126935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue.
    Saito S; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1309-40. PubMed ID: 15513248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: is there an effect on all trials?
    Saint-Aubin J; Ouellette D; Poirier M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 15945210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Phonological similarity effect in complex span task.
    Camos V; Mora G; Barrouillet P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(10):1927-50. PubMed ID: 23419012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Processing acoustically presented time intervals of seconds duration: an expression of the phonological loop of the working memory?].
    Grube D
    Z Exp Psychol; 1996; 43(4):527-46. PubMed ID: 9206583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The phonological similarity effect in short-term memory serial recall in schizophrenia.
    Elvevåg B; Weinberger DR; Goldberg TE
    Psychiatry Res; 2002 Sep; 112(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 12379453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.