66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8302210)
21. A preliminary investigation of the imaging performance of photostimulable phosphor computed radiography using a new design of mammographic quality control test object.
Cowen AR; Brettle DS; Coleman NJ; Parkin GJ
Br J Radiol; 1992 Jun; 65(774):528-35. PubMed ID: 1628185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [AN experience of using a digital mammograph].
Rozhkova NI; Prokopenko SP; Kochetova GP; Chikirdin EG
Med Tekh; 2004; (2):42-5. PubMed ID: 15148891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Equipment for digital mammography].
Blinov NN; Kozlovskiĭ ÉB; Mazurov AI
Med Tekh; 2014; (5):1-4. PubMed ID: 25543389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Optical processing architecture and its potential application for digital and analog radiography.
Liu H; Xu J; Fajardo LL
Med Phys; 1999 Apr; 26(4):648-52. PubMed ID: 10227368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Development of an anthropomorphic breast phantom.
Caldwell CB; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 1990; 17(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 2333054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mammography goes digital.
Health News; 2001 Feb; 7(2):4. PubMed ID: 11232117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Image quality of digital direct flat-panel mammography versus an indirect small-field CCD technique using a high-contrast phantom.
Krug KB; Stützer H; Frommolt P; Boecker J; Bovenschulte H; Sendler V; Lackner K
Int J Breast Cancer; 2011; 2011():701054. PubMed ID: 22332015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Skinline detection in digitized mammograms.
Abdel-Mottaleb M; Carman CS; Hill CR; Vafai S
J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3 Suppl 1):224-5. PubMed ID: 9268889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [A trial of digital television cytophotometry].
Agroskin LS; Papaian GV
Tsitologiia; 1988 Apr; 30(4):503-10. PubMed ID: 3413835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mammography phototimer technique chart.
Niklason LT; Barnes GT; Rubin E
Radiology; 1985 Nov; 157(2):539-40. PubMed ID: 4048467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Daylight development and mammography (author's transl)].
Berry M
J Radiol; 1982 Feb; 63(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 7086731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Using a CCD camera imaging system as a recording device to quantify human DNA by slot blot hybridization.
Budowle B; Hudlow WR; Lee SB; Klevan L
Biotechniques; 2001 Mar; 30(3):680-5. PubMed ID: 11252803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Digital imaging in transmission electron microscopy.
Fan GY; Ellisman MH
J Microsc; 2000 Oct; 200(Pt 1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11012823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Phantoms for evaluating mammography techniques and roentgenographic detail.
Egan RL; Fenn JO
Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1968 Apr; 102(4):936-40. PubMed ID: 5643220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A phantom designed to compare the quality of various mammographic images.
Tonge KA; Davis R
Br J Radiol; 1978 Sep; 51(609):731-3. PubMed ID: 698517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Digital imaging in hematology.
Linder J; Zahniser DJ
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2012 May; 44(5):14, 16, 18. PubMed ID: 22649964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Signal processing techniques for CCD image sensors.
Lee WH
Appl Opt; 1984 Dec; 23(23):4280-4. PubMed ID: 18213309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A new phantom for mammography.
Moores BM
Br J Radiol; 1991 Jul; 64(763):639-40. PubMed ID: 1873668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Analytical applications of optical imaging fibers.
Pantano P; Walt DR
Anal Chem; 1995 Aug; 67(15):481A-487A. PubMed ID: 8849033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Digital array scanned interferometer: sensors and results.
Smith WH; Hammer PD
Appl Opt; 1996 Jun; 35(16):2902-9. PubMed ID: 21085440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
