48 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8302211)
1. Anthropomorphic radiological phantoms for mammography.
Yaffe MJ; Byng JW; Caldwell CB; Bennett NR
Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 8302211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Direct digital mammography using a scanned-slot CCD imaging system.
Yaffe MJ
Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 8302210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anthropomorphic radiologic phantoms.
Yaffe MJ; Johns PC; Nishikawa RM; Mawdsley GE; Caldwell CB
Radiology; 1986 Feb; 158(2):550-2. PubMed ID: 3941885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a novel method of noise reduction using computer-simulated mammograms.
Tischenko O; Hoeschen C; Dance DR; Hunt RA; Maidment AD; Bakic PR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):81-4. PubMed ID: 15933085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interpolation algorithms for digital mammography systems with multiple detectors.
Liu H; Wang G; Chen J; Fajardo LL
Acad Radiol; 1999 Mar; 6(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 10898036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hybrid computational phantoms of the male and female newborn patient: NURBS-based whole-body models.
Lee C; Lodwick D; Hasenauer D; Williams JL; Lee C; Bolch WE
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(12):3309-33. PubMed ID: 17664546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of an anthropomorphic breast phantom.
Caldwell CB; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 1990; 17(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 2333054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the need to revise the arm structure in stylized anthropomorphic phantoms in lateral photon irradiation geometry.
Lee C; Lee C; Lee JK
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):N393-402. PubMed ID: 17047258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality assurance breast phantoms for screen-film mammography: design and use.
Stanton L; Villafana T
Appl Radiol; 1989 Nov; 18(11):41-8. PubMed ID: 10304413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Re "Phantom study for the detection of simulated lesions in five different digital and one conventional mammography system"].
Brunst G
Rofo; 2004 Nov; 176(11):1702; author reply 1702. PubMed ID: 15559966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Are phantoms useful for predicting the potential of dose reduction in full-field digital mammography?
Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(8):1851-70. PubMed ID: 15815100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-aided evaluation of screening mammograms based on local texture models.
Grim J; Somol P; Haindl M; Danes J
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Apr; 18(4):765-73. PubMed ID: 19228558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phantoms for evaluating mammography techniques and roentgenographic detail.
Egan RL; Fenn JO
Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1968 Apr; 102(4):936-40. PubMed ID: 5643220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Proposals for standardizing the image quality of mammography (author's transl)].
Frischbier HJ; Gregl A; Hoeffken W; Hüppe JR
Radiologe; 1977 May; 17(5):193-4. PubMed ID: 877263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new phantom for mammography.
Law J
Br J Radiol; 1991 Feb; 64(758):116-20. PubMed ID: 2004202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
