These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
48 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8302211)
21. Optimized 3D coordinate reconstruction from paired stereographs using a calibrated phantom. Small CF; Bryant JT J Biomed Eng; 1993 Mar; 15(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 8459699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Skinline detection in digitized mammograms. Abdel-Mottaleb M; Carman CS; Hill CR; Vafai S J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3 Suppl 1):224-5. PubMed ID: 9268889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Development of radiographic chest phantoms. Constantinou C; Cameron J; DeWerd L; Liss M Med Phys; 1986; 13(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 3796489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Superimposed peripheral pulmonary vasculature in anthropomorphic chest phantoms. van Proosdij MP; Schultze Kool LJ; Oestmann JW Invest Radiol; 1994 Apr; 29(4):466-8. PubMed ID: 8034454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Phantoms for specifications and quality assurance of MR imaging scanners. Goodenough DJ; Weaver KE Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1988; 12(4):193-209. PubMed ID: 3179973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Scoring of image quality phantom films in mammography. Robinson A; Underwood AC Br J Radiol; 1991 Jul; 64(763):640-1. PubMed ID: 1873669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Measurement of activity in anthropomorphic organ phantoms. Hui TE; Nichols LL; Olsen PC; McDonald JC Health Phys; 1993 Mar; 64(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 8432650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [A palpable anthropomorphic medel for the calibration of whole-body counters]. Poulheim KF Strahlentherapie; 1968 Feb; 135(2):217-9. PubMed ID: 5670507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A new phantom for mammography. Moores BM Br J Radiol; 1991 Jul; 64(763):639-40. PubMed ID: 1873668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Inconsistencies in mammographic phantoms used for ACR accreditation. Cacak RK Radiology; 1991 Oct; 181(1):288-9. PubMed ID: 1887052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Inexpensive human organ phantoms. Early PJ; Miller W; Hubbard DL J Nucl Med; 1968 Jun; 9(6):271-2. PubMed ID: 5647702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Stopping powers of materials for heterogeneous skull phantoms]. Lisovets SP; Reznik BI Med Radiol (Mosk); 1980 Sep; 25(9):71-2. PubMed ID: 6252407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Prerequisites of mammography]. Bösche H Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1968; 9(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 5682686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Detection, signal processing, and calibration In lmmunoassay systems. Bonini PA; Banfi G; Pazzagli M; Messeri G; Roda A J Automat Chem; 1991; 13(2):45-7. PubMed ID: 18925295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Anthropomorphic radiological phantoms for mammography. Yaffe MJ; Byng JW; Caldwell CB; Bennett NR Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 8302211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Direct digital mammography using a scanned-slot CCD imaging system. Yaffe MJ Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 8302210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system. Marshall NW Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]