BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8302502)

  • 1. A survey of urban and rural participants in the Otago-Southland pilot breast cancer screening programme.
    Richardson AK; Elwood JM; McNoe B; Bang E
    N Z Med J; 1994 Feb; 107(971):36-8. PubMed ID: 8302502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The costs of mammography screening in New Zealand: evidence from the pilot programmes.
    Menon A; Devlin NJ; Richardson AK
    N Z Med J; 1994 Dec; 107(991):501-3. PubMed ID: 7830979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can Flemish women in semi-rural areas be motivated to attend organized breast cancer screening?
    Van Hal G; Matthyssen M; Thibaut A; Weyler J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Apr; 47(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 10367299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Population-based breast cancer screening: policy advice for a New Zealand screening programme. Breast Cancer Screening Policy Advisory Group.
    N Z Med J; 1998 Apr; 111(1064):138-42. PubMed ID: 9612474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast, colon, and prostate screening in the adult population of Croatia: does rural origin matter?
    Polasek O; Kolcic I; Voncina L; Strnad M; Vuletic S; Kern J
    Rural Remote Health; 2007; 7(3):749. PubMed ID: 17900222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical outcomes of the Otago-Southland Breast Cancer Screening Programme 1991-1996.
    Doyle TC; Elwood JM; Smale P; Berkeley BB; Blennerhassett JB; Miller AP; Chartres SM; Hunter MH; Packer SG; Pfeifer M
    N Z Med J; 1998 Oct; 111(1075):380-3. PubMed ID: 9830418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of the educated and non-educated women to cancer of the breast in semi-urban and rural areas of SouthWest, Nigeria.
    Aderounmu AO; Egbewale BE; Ojofeitimi EO; Fadiora SO; Oguntola AS; Asekun-Olarinmoye EO; Adeoti ML; Akanbi O
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2006 Sep; 13(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 17066102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
    Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Counting the costs of mammography screening: first year results from the Sydney study.
    Gerard K; Salkeld G; Hall J
    Med J Aust; 1990 May; 152(9):466, 469-71. PubMed ID: 2381337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Satisfaction and expectations of the women participants and not participants in the breast cancer screening programme in Barcelona after 10 years of operation].
    Serral Cano G; Puigpinós I Riera R; Robles Garrido I; Pons-Vigués M; Borrell C
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2010; 84(6):717-29. PubMed ID: 21327308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
    Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bowel cancer screening in England: a qualitative study of GPs' attitudes and information needs.
    Woodrow C; Rozmovits L; Hewitson P; Rose P; Austoker J; Watson E
    BMC Fam Pract; 2006 Sep; 7():53. PubMed ID: 16981989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of health care, cost, and culture on breast cancer screening: issues facing urban American Indian women.
    Risendal B; Roe D; DeZapien J; Papenfuss M; Giuliano A
    Prev Med; 1999 Dec; 29(6 Pt 1):501-9. PubMed ID: 10600431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pattern of participation in a cohort aged 50-60 years at first invitation to the service-screening programme with mammography in Stockholm county, Sweden.
    Törnberg S; Kemetli L; Svane G; Rosén M; Stenbeck M; Nyström L
    Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):728-33. PubMed ID: 16137757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonparticipation in mammography screening: apathy, anxiety or cost?
    Munn EM
    N Z Med J; 1993 Jul; 106(959):284-6. PubMed ID: 8321446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors likely to affect participation in mammographic screening.
    Richardson A
    N Z Med J; 1990 Apr; 103(887):155-6. PubMed ID: 2342672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The general practitioner's role in breast cancer screening: a survey in Otago-Southland.
    Miller D; McNoe B; Elwood M; Doyle TC
    N Z Med J; 1998 Feb; 111(1059):24-8. PubMed ID: 9506667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Knowledge and practice of breast cancer screening amongst public health nurses in Singapore.
    Chong PN; Krishnan M; Hong CY; Swah TS
    Singapore Med J; 2002 Oct; 43(10):509-16. PubMed ID: 12587705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast cancer screening practices of Alberta women.
    AARN News Lett; 1992; 48(7):33-4. PubMed ID: 1509867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.